Subtotal:
    does not include shipping and tax

    Daisy Precision Max .177 Cal, 7.8 Grains, Wadcutter, 500ct reviews - page 1


    In stock


    Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

    Average Customer Review

    4(22 reviews)
    5 star:4 star:3 star:2 star:1 star:
    (5 votes)(7 votes)(3 votes)(5 votes)(2 votes)
    The most favorable reviewThe most critical review
    0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:

    Overall rating:5

    Value for money:4

    Size/Shape Distribution:5

    By Customer from USA on 2009-02-10 19:49:56

    Things I liked:Work Great for Daisy Models! Dead on accuracy!
    Things I would have changed:Less led!
    What others should know:I perfer these over Crosman and Beeman Pellets
    0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:

    Overall rating:1

    Value for money:1

    Size/Shape Distribution:1

    By Glen from USA on 2011-06-27 14:27:35

    Things I liked:NOTHING
    Things I would have changed:STOP MAKING THEM
    What others should know:THESE ARE THE WORST SHOOTING PELLETS I HAVE TRIED. I HAD SEVERAL THAT WENT INTO BARREL WHEN I SEATED THEM. THE OLD DAISY QUICK SILVER PELLETS WERE MUCH MORE ACCURATE.
    Sort by:
    • 123 Next »
    • Show:
      Items
    • Overall rating:5 5.0

      Value for money:5 5.0

      Size/Shape Distribution:5 5.0

      By Antoni from USA on 2011-11-17 21:38:07
      See all my reviews
       Was this review helpful?
      00 ratings
      Things I liked:best pellet for the money. I have tested several brands ( RWS, H&N)in a bench rest and have found hardly any difference worth the low price. At 33 feet the difference between the RWS and the Daisy is less than half the diameter of a pellet.
      Things I would have changed:I shoot these pellets by the tens of thousands ( I have a rapid fire Steyr LP50). I get about one or two bad pellets per 500. Considering that they are less than half the price, I'll deal with two bad pellets per 500.
      What others should know:It would be nice if they were available in bulk packs of a few thousand in a box. I throw a lot of tins away.
    • Overall rating:1 1.0

      Value for money:1 1.0

      Size/Shape Distribution:1 1.0

      By Glen from USA on 2011-06-27 14:27:35
      See all my reviews
       Was this review helpful?
      00 ratings
      Things I liked:NOTHING
      Things I would have changed:STOP MAKING THEM
      What others should know:THESE ARE THE WORST SHOOTING PELLETS I HAVE TRIED. I HAD SEVERAL THAT WENT INTO BARREL WHEN I SEATED THEM. THE OLD DAISY QUICK SILVER PELLETS WERE MUCH MORE ACCURATE.
    • Overall rating:1 1.0

      Value for money:2 2.0

      Size/Shape Distribution:1 1.0

      By Connor from USA on 2011-01-26 18:51:35
      See all my reviews
       Was this review helpful?
      21 rating
      Things I liked:great if you feel like wasting the air in your gun and it doesn't matter if you hit what your aiming at
      Things I would have changed:harder lead that wont dent as easily; more uniform
      What others should know:highly dont recomend for just about anything
    • Overall rating:5 5.0

      Value for money:5 5.0

      Size/Shape Distribution:3 3.0

      By Antoni from USA on 2010-09-25 09:19:08
      See all my reviews
       Was this review helpful?
      00 ratings
      Things I liked:Great value. The buy three get one free option is an additional 25% discount. I bought sufficient pellets to get free shipping as well. These pellets are just slightly less accurate than the top of the line pellets like RWS, H&N.
      Things I would have changed:Daisy should offer these pellets in bulk packs to save money. I throw a lot of tins away.
      What others should know:I critically tested these pellets against RWS Meister using a FWB P34 with its metal grip handle secured in a vice to avoid movement. The Daisy pellet gave a ten meter group about half a pellet width greater than the RWS. Not bad, considering the price.
    • Overall rating:4 4.0

      Value for money:5 5.0

      Size/Shape Distribution:4 4.0

      By GLH from USA on 2010-08-03 15:35:23
      See all my reviews
       Was this review helpful?
      00 ratings
      Things I liked:they are cheep, typically in shape and they are very accurate at 25'
      Things I would have changed:nothing
      What others should know: i use these in my dessert eagle co2 pistol and a 60 year old USSR break barrel. they work perfectly but are a little dirty. i recommend cleaning your gun after 300 or so.
    • Overall rating:4 4.0

      Value for money:4 4.0

      Size/Shape Distribution:3 3.0

      By Mike from USA on 2010-02-28 20:29:16
      See all my reviews
       Was this review helpful?
      00 ratings
      Things I liked:Price, and Pyramidair's 4 for 3 deal.
      What others should know:The weight variation is greater than some of the more expensive pellets available. I shoot mostly offhand at 7.5 meters, and offhand pistol silhouettes. I find these pellets less variable than me! If I was going into serious bench rest shooting I would look at a more closely controlled weight brand.
    • Overall rating:2 2.0

      Value for money:3 3.0

      Size/Shape Distribution:2 2.0

      By Rob from USA on 2010-01-12 00:06:48
      See all my reviews
       Was this review helpful?
      00 ratings
      Things I liked:500 pellets for around $5.00.
      Things I would have changed:Size not uniform. Smaller pellets often fall out of rotary clip for my Crosman T4 causing a jam within the gun. Lots of lead residue covering the pellets.
      What others should know:Low price but you may have to toss out a few of the smaller ones to avoid jams in guns using rotary clips.
    • Overall rating:5 5.0

      Value for money:5 5.0

      By Steve from USA on 2009-12-18 19:21:23
      See all my reviews
       Was this review helpful?
      00 ratings
      Things I liked:The price. With the buy 3 get 1 Free offer these are the least expensive pellets I have found. I purchased them primarily for indoor target practice. I shoot into a trap at between 20 and 30 feet. When I rest the 1377 pistol on a bench the groups are rarely larger than a dime.
    • Overall rating:4 4.0

      Value for money:4 4.0

      Size/Shape Distribution:2 2.0

      By Victor from USA on 2009-11-03 01:51:38
      See all my reviews
       Was this review helpful?
      51 rating
      Things I liked:Surprisingly accurate at low-velocities in comparion for more expensive pellets. I'm not a great shot, but 35 years ago I was. I was able to hold a 1/2" average center-to-center group at 55 feet except for one flyer. I used a Benjamin Sheriden 397P with 4 pumps. They out performed the following: Crossman Competition, Beeman Wadcutter, Gammo Match, and Baretta Ultra Match. WHAT A SURPRISE! The cheapest performed best!
      Things I would have changed:Better manufacturing/production process. Each pellet was unique. I don't think that a single pellet has a round skirt (each was irregular). I first tried these with my Gamo Compact target pistol and had a pellet fall through the barrel. This is not just an issue of imperfection of the skirt (which is obvious), but of irregularity of the whole pellet. Definitely not a pellet that one can trust for serious practice, let alone competition.
      What others should know:Got similarly excellent performance with my Crossman 760 at 4 pumps, but much worse results at 6 pumps (again at 55 feet). This pellet definitely favors low velocities. Again, not for serious practice, but definitely a winner for low velocity shooting (backyard or garage). As they are cheap, a real value in my opinion.
    • Overall rating:2 2.0

      Value for money:2 2.0

      Size/Shape Distribution:1 1.0

      By sebastian from USA on 2009-08-08 16:04:13
      See all my reviews
       Was this review helpful?
      00 ratings
      Things I liked:none
      Things I would have changed:a bigger skirt
      What others should know:im not saying these are bad pellets they just dont work for gamo big cat 1200 they make the gun dieseling alot
    • 123 Next »