| The most favorable review | The most critical review | |
|---|---|---|
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
By Tom from USA on 2008-01-03 17:55:49 Things I liked:This pellet is the most accurate long-range (not 10 meter) pellet I've ever tested in .177 caliber. It's very uniform in weight and shape and is made from pure lead, so there's seldom a problem with leading. I don't know of a better .177 caliber pellet at this time.Things I would have changed:I wish JSB would ship their pellets faster. What others should know:A pellet this heavy is probably not going to work in a lot of spring guns, but try it anyway. And, use it in PCPs, multi-pumps and CO2 rifles. | ![]() |
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:
By matt from USA on 2013-01-14 13:45:15 Things I liked:They are very clean and look like quality pellets.Things I would have changed:These are NOT THE SAME PELLETS as what I found in the JSB Sampler Test pack. For *me* and my RWS 34 (.177) the 100 Exact Heavy pellets in the sampler pack were magical. Based on my experience with the sampler pack I bought 1,500 (3 tins) more of them. Big disappointment... What others should know:Fortunately I still had a dozen or so Exact Heavy pellets remaining from the Test Sampler and was able to measure and compare them to the newer full tins I purchased. Here is what I found: "Old" test sampler pellets leading edge 4.445 mm --- 4.4831 mm trailing edge 4.5212 mm --- 4.5974 mm 10.333 grains "New" full-tin pellets leading edge 4.4323 mm --- 4.4577 mm trailing edge 4.4958 mm --- 4.5466 mm 10.316 grains Waiting to hear back from JSB (http://www.schulzdiabolo.cz/en/) regarding this... |
| Show: | Items |
Overall rating:5 5.0
Value for money:5 5.0
Size/Shape Distribution:5 5.0
See all my reviews
Things I would have changed:Make them free (for me only)!
What others should know:Great for tameing down fps and gaining stability in higher power springers.