does not include shipping and tax
Lifetime limited warranty
List Price $672.00 Save $72.05 (10%)
Want it delivered 07-29-2014?
Order it in the next 7 hr and 32 min and choose Next Day Air Morning at checkout.
Note: Same Day Shipping Exempt. Details
Create an online reviewand share your thoughts with other customers
Things I liked:RE: .22 (which has 12FPE) Accuracy. Literal one-holer at 15 yds. Haven't been out further, yet. Weight of polymer stock is appreciably lighter (but still hefty) than wood versions. Adore the barrel lock which should assure consistent lock-up. Trigger is very nice and light but might need some adjusting with a screwdriver or the included allen wrench. Doesn't seem particularly pellet sensitive. Pellet heads go in with a light, snug, feeling rather than either falling in or needing to be forced. I haven't found it to be very hold sensitive, either. I've shot straight off a bag (around its balance point) as well as "artillery" with close results
Things I would have changed:I'd love a blued muzzle break instead of painted. I wish they offered options, such as a muzzle break with no sights (easier cocking leverage). Would be nice if sights were offered in different styles such as hooded with different inserts like Weihrauch. My pref is for aperture sights over tru-glo (which probably work better in some applications) Would like to see availability of their Tuning Trigger and which is still overseas, but not here in the States
What others should know:Short barrel so cocking isn't as light as some. Not troubling, just not the effort of an R7. There may be a slight buzz from the spring but not a strong twang like most rifles. Sure it is a smoother shot cycle than the higher power versions in .177 but why isn't the larger caliber available in that higher power? I think to 25 yards, you're hard to beat the LGV .22, but the trajectory will arc fairly hard after that, so know your mil-dots!
Things I liked:Workmanship, nicely blued, minimum recoil, positive barrel lock, consistent accuracy
Things I would have changed:Less weight would be nice and a little less mechanical "twang"
Got a question? Got an answer?
Sign Into Your Account
Sign Into Your Existing Account