Item Code: HN-92174500003 [PY-P-746]
|Muzzle Energy||10 ft/lbs|
|Muzzle Velocity||669 fps|
|Energy at 25 yds||7 ft/lbs|
|Velocity at 25 yds||564 fps|
|Energy from the initial value at 25 yards||71 % Retained energy at 25 yds (an expression of the 25-yd energy compared to the muzzle energy)|
|Energy at 50 yds||5 ft/lbs|
|Velocity at 50 yds||486 fps|
|Energy from the initial value at 50 yards||52 % Retained energy at 50 yds (an expression of the 50-yd energy compared to the muzzle energy)|
Things I liked: Creates an exit wound that looks like a .22 Cal. Most accurate hp pellet when shot from my 1720T, more accurate than the Extremes. These are my favorite hollow points when it comes to transferring energy to the target, when it comes to accuracy the .22 Terminators are the most accurate out of my HW95.
Things I liked: A hard hitting, heavy, accurate hollowpoint.
Things I would have changed: More pellets for the price.
What others should know: I purchased these for my first new airrifle purchase in 22 years, the Octane. Accuracy was ok, I can't completely rule out that I am part of the accuracy being only ok. This is my first break barrel, gas ram gun, and the artillery hold is tough to master. Out of curiosity, I tried them in my 22 year old Benjamin 397. Wow! Since I was only an occasional shooter, I only had used Crosmans in the 7.9 grain weight in my 397. The hollow point Hunters from H & N delivered more accuracy and down range punch than I ever got out of that gun.
Things I liked: Quality, accuracy
Things I would have changed: 500 in a tin at the same price would always be a nice thing
What others should know: They shoot accurately and well out of my .177 Octane. Are quieter than the lighter weight pellets. That of course is because of lower fps but although I have not yet hunted with them I feel they will have more than adequate knock down power.
I have stoeger atac .177. What OF THE TWO bullets are better for hunting up to 45m, H&N BARACUDA HUNTER HOLLOWPOINT OR H&N ?BARACUDA MATCH