1895 Nagant vs. 1895 Nagant Part 3

1895 Nagant vs. 1895 Nagant Part 3 Part 2 Part 1

The Russian Version of BBs vs. Pellets

By Dennis Adler

The Gletcher Model 1895 Nagant pistols deliver design quality, accuracy in features as well as downrange, and a choice of either a smoothbore BB or rifled barrel version. Gletcher also has a nickel silver version which is a sharp looking gun, but very few, if any were originally nickel plated. The blued guns were, however, sometimes engraved. The Gletcher models open up a variety of possibilities for customizing as well as just being authentic copies of one of the most famous military revolvers in history.

Like the Umarex Colt Peacemakers and the ASG Dan Wesson Model 715 double action revolvers, the Gletcher Model 1895 Nagant double actions are a perfect set for BB and pellet-firing cartridges. The Nagant models are also true to their centerfire predecessors with the exception of a manual safety on some of the newer production guns, but even the Peacemakers and Dan Wesson CO2 models are fitted with these added safety mechanisms. And let me digress on that for a moment because there are several reasons for adding manual safeties to air pistols when their centerfire counterparts, except most semi-autos, were never equipped with them.

Adding a manual thumb safety to the Gletcher Model 1895 was perhaps necessary for an air pistol (even Colt Peacemakers and Schofield single action have them fitted), but this is not one of the more elegant applications. Pictured above the latest Gletcher pellet model with manual safety is a WWII era Webley MK IV which was fitted with a crossbolt hammer block safety, a subtle but equally effective means of adding a safety to a centerfire double action military revolver.

First is a pervasive need for manufacturers to explore every option that can prevent them from litigation in the event of an accident, i.e., during a deposition the questions, “Did the airgun have a safety mechanism? Was the safety mechanism properly set prior to the accident?” Yes and yes are the correct answers because we are beyond a time when personal responsibility and common sense are enough. We need backups. In the Old West, a smart cowboy carried his revolver with the hammer resting on an empty chamber. Guns got dropped, they could fall out of a holster unless you had it latched down with a loop around the hammer; your horse might get spooked and you end up getting thrown, and invariably a revolver lands on its hammer; boom. Semi-autos had some form of safety mechanism almost from the onset, or one could do what was in the military manual of operation; not carry the pistol with a round chambered. Personal responsibility was a powerful thing back in the day. Second, while we speak of these air pistols as “adult airguns” there are a lot of younger airgun enthusiasts and with adult supervision a CO2 pistol is a great way to learn gun basics, and the manual safety and observing safety measures should be taught from day one. What better place to begin than learning to set a safety (even if the real guns don’t have them). Safety should always be the first order of training with any gun no matter what it shoots.

Webley was faced with a similar task on versions of its .38 caliber MK IV during the war years and solved the problem by adding a fairly unobtrusive crossbolt safety that blocked the hammer and could be easily set and released with either hand, maintaining the pistol’s ambidextrous handling. It was, of course, a topbreak design, which makes it ambidextrous. This approach might have worked for the Gletcher Nagant and would have looked better.
The Gletcher approach to adding a manual safety on a double action revolver achieves the end goal of blocking the hammer when set (as shown in the lower position), and is about as well placed as it can be for a safety with a lever. It can be set and released with the trigger finger or for left-handed shooters with the thumb. It is easy to operate.

Find a Hawke Scope

Yes, it is an odd thing for a double action revolver like the Nagant but maybe Webley had a good idea back in the war years with the MK IV crossbolt safety. Honestly the best revolver safety I have seen on a CO2 pistol is the one used on S&W revolvers and the early ASG Dan Wesson models with the S&W-style thumb latch cylinder release. They use the thumb latch as a manual safety by pushing it back. But I said there were three reasons why we see manual safeties on revolvers, and this goes back to the second, and this is endemic in our society. No one wants to take responsibility, so manufacturers have to make it more difficult to be irresponsible.

Four ways to send BBs or pellets downrange; the Gletcher 1895 Nagant pellet model (top) with 4-1/4 inch rifled barrel (shown with Meisterkugeln Professional Line lead wadcutters and H&N Sport Match Green alloy pellets), and smoothbore BB version (shown with Air Venturi Dust Devils frangible BBs and Umarex Precision steel BBs). The BB version can also load the pellet cartridges and fire lead or alloy pellets with surprising accuracy out to 25 feet.

Test loads

The Nagant air pistol cartridges are of two different designs as I noted in Part 2, so there is no 100 percent comparison because pellet-loading shells that have the pellet at the back, where it has the advantage of receiving the full CO2 charge before it heads through the core of the brass shell and into the barrel, where as the BB shells load the BB in the nose where a bullet should be, but the air has already begun to expand before it gets behind the BB and sends it down the barrel. How much difference does this make? In earlier tests, rear-loading shells (BB and pellet) slightly out perform front loading shells. The more interesting shift in the BB vs. pellet equation is going to be lighter grain weight Dust Devils vs. alloy 4.5mm pellets! We are going to run this test four times, steel BBs vs. lead wadcutters, and Dust Devils vs. alloy wadcutters, so all four types can be cross referenced for performance.

The plastic grips do a fine job reproducing the look of the Nagant which used matching inserts at the frontstrap and backstrap to improve the gripping surface. This was well ahead of other handguns for front and backstrap grip design. The left side Gletcher grip panel lifts off to access the CO2 loading channel. There is a small relieved surface at the lower front to and raise the grip panel for removal.

BBs vs. pellets

To test both the BB and pellet models, the target is set at a compromised range of 25 feet, just a bit further than normal for optimum BB accuracy and a little closer for pellets.

Double action trigger pull on the BB Nagant measured a smooth 8 pounds, 5.5 ounces average, and the trigger solidly stages the hammer half way through allowing a very solid hold on target. Single action trigger pull measured a modest 5 pounds, 8 ounces average and again very smooth with no stacking. On the pellet model, double action averaged 9 pounds, 13.5 ounces, solidly staging the hammer half way through, and 5 pounds, 7.5 ounces single action.

With the left grip panel removed, it is easy to see how the CO2 loads in the Nagant. The lanyard loop is the turnkey for seating the CO2 cartridge. The narrow grip profile of the Gletcher Nagant is also the most compact of any CO2 pistol and answers a big question of whether smaller grip-sized revolvers like WWI and WWII era Colt and S&W models could be copied as CO2 pistols. Yes they can, if any manufacturers are willing to step up.

The CO2 cartridge loads into the left side of the grip frame by removing the left panel, which has a discrete notch at the lower edge. The lanyard ring at the base of the grip is attached to the retention screw that seats the CO2 cartridge. Turning the lanyard ring raises the cartridge until it is pierced, making the gun ready to load and fire. With the grips mounted and the lanyard ring turned all the way up it looks absolutely authentic! As for loading, the Nagant is as slow in the 21st century as it was in the 20th. Thumb the loading gate down, rotate the cylinder and load each chamber just like a Colt Peacemaker.

Dust Devils gave high velocity and respectable accuracy at 25 feet, clearing the chronograph’s screens at an average of 407 fps and a best five-shot group measuring 0.56 inches. (All shooting tests were fired single action using a two-handed hold.)

Starting with frangible composite Dust Devils, it is important to know that they are less consistent in size compared to steel BBs (also a fraction smaller) and have to be carefully seated into the nose of the BB cartridge using some type of seating tool (you usually find these with some pellet firing pistols but a small wood dowel works just fine) to make certain they do not fall out (and they do). It is a slower loading process but it does pay off in an average velocity of 407 fps with a high of 420 fps for seven rounds. Umarex Precision steel BBs averaged 385 fps, with a high of 396 fps for seven rounds, so both get downrange at a pretty good clip.

Steel BBs produced an average velocity of 385 fps with a best five-shot group measuring 0.93 inches at 25 feet.

Switching to the Nagant pellet model, Meisterkugeln Professional Line 7.0 gr. lead wadcutters from the rifled barrel delivered an average velocity of 396 fps with a high of 403 fps. Loaded with H&N Sport Match Green alloy wadcutters, average velocity clocked a hasty 454 fps with a high of 467 fps. I also ran the pellet cartridges through the smoothbore BB model loaded with the H&N alloy wadcutters and they clocked an average velocity of 453 fps with a high of 462 fps, so there is almost no difference in velocity between the smoothbore and rifled barrel Nagant models using the same cartridges and alloy pellets. The Nagant Model 1895 pistols deliver high velocity no matter what you load. The final cut will be accuracy.

You can shoot the pellet loading cartridges from the smoothbore BB model Nagant and it will deliver high velocity (with alloy pellets like H&N Sport Match Green 5.25 gr. wadcutters) and more than acceptable accuracy for a smoothbore firing pellets. Average velocity with the H&N was 453 fps with a best five rounds at 1.18 inches.

Accuracy at 25 feet with Dust Devils was very satisfactory, despite the issues with loading them into the nose of the BB cartridges. My best 7-shot group had a spread of 1.68 inches with a best five rounds clustered at 0.56 inches left of the bullseye.

Switching to Umarex steel BBs the next seven rounds at 25 feet punched into 1.24 inches with four hits left of the bullseye (cutting the line between the 9 and 10 rings at 10 o’clock) and three strung together in the red. My best five were a little wider at 0.93 inches. One last run at 25 feet with pellet cartridges firing the 453 fps H&N alloy wadcutters delivered seven hard hitting rounds a little wider but center at 1.725 inches with a best five measuring 1.18 inches. I would definitely invest in a couple of packs of pellet cartridges if I already had the BB model and was happy with it, but still wanted to shoot pellets.

The Nagant pellet model is a more accurate pistol overall and delivers sub 1-inch groups at 25 feet. Meisterkugeln 7.0 gr. lead wadcutters clocked 396 fps average and punched six out of seven rounds into 0.625 inches.

The pellet model Nagant is a tack driver, as might be expected sending seven Meisterkugeln wadcutters into 1.125 inches with six out of seven at 0.625 inches, actually 0.06 inches wider than the Dust Devils at the same 25 foot distance from the BB model but with more overlapping hits.

Best group of the day is owned by the pellet-firing Nagant Model 1895 with H&N 5.25 gr. alloy wadcutters at an average velocity of 454 fps and placing seven rounds at a dime-sized 0.56 inches.

Switching to the higher velocity 5.25 gr. H&N Sport Match Green alloy pellets, the Nagant slammed seven into a dime-sized overlapping spread measuring 0.56 inches, but remember this is at 25 feet not 10 meters. Still, the best group of the day and a final reminder that this is a pair of CO2 models you really want to own.

10 thoughts on “1895 Nagant vs. 1895 Nagant Part 3”

  1. Outstanding accuracy and velocity of the pellet version. Glad I picked up a second one . Gletcher should be more aggressive marketing these. Anyone who doesn’t own one of these, should. Nice shooting!

  2. Would beinteresting to see if the Nagant could be modified to hit another 100 fps . Wonder how far out the fast stepping Nagant could maintain that excellent pellet accuracy.

    • The last dozen or so shots are usually useless. Modifying the valve for higher velocity is a win / win. Closer to doing what 22 rimfire does , more accuracy out to 10 yards and maybe 15. Shoot almost everywhere safely, and could even be used to dispatch small pests. There are several pellet revolvers that would benefit . The Nagant , The Peacemakers especially on reactive targets, Webley MarkVI, the Dan Wesson 715 Series. Add a rifled barrel to the Schofield and it qualifies. I had an old Crosman 600 revalved to hit over 400 fps, and vastly improved it . Only around 30 shots per co2 , but quality beats quantity.

  3. Haven’t seen any advertised, will try to see if any of the airgun smiths are doing them . Would involve changing hammer strike on valve and maybe a revalve

  4. I’m doing much better with the Mosin Nagant M1944 rifle. Yesterday I shot this 15 shot group from a bench rested (BR) position at 10 meters (m) firing slowly at a rate of about 1 shot every 5 to 10 seconds using Hornady Black Diamond BBs. The 15 shot group is about 0.75 inch center to center.

Leave a Comment