Create an online review and share your thoughts with other customers
| ||||||
|
| Show: | Items |
|
By John from USA on 2011-05-14 14:04:31 See all my reviews | Was this review helpful? 00 ratings |
|
By Jason from USA on 2011-04-23 11:53:07 See all my reviews | Was this review helpful? 00 ratings |
|
By James from USA on 2010-08-17 16:35:09 See all my reviews | Was this review helpful? 00 ratings |
|
By louis from USA on 2010-06-11 23:08:51 See all my reviews | Was this review helpful? 00 ratings |
|
By robin from USA on 2010-05-20 05:53:43 See all my reviews | Was this review helpful? 00 ratings |
|
By Glenn from USA on 2010-04-17 22:21:02 See all my reviews | Was this review helpful? 00 ratings |
|
By Eric from USA on 2010-01-26 16:19:42 See all my reviews | Was this review helpful? 00 ratings |
|
By Donald from USA on 2009-05-23 13:18:30 See all my reviews | Was this review helpful? 00 ratings |
|
By Stanley from USA on 2008-04-14 17:26:41 See all my reviews | Was this review helpful? 00 ratings |
Overall rating:4 4.0
Value for money:5 5.0
Accuracy:5 5.0
See all my reviews
Things I would have changed:The CO2 mag could have a heavier spring in it. Sometimes it doesn't want to pierce the CO2 cartridge. I fixed that by adding a flat washer at the top of the spring in the CO2 mag. I found that a flat washer of .75mm to 1mm thickness works best. Too thick a washer makes the CO2 difficult to eject. Other than that, no complaints, none at all.
What others should know:The front sight is thick and flat. I rounded it off with a file and replaced the white paint on the front sight with high visibility yellow. I also put a touch of high visibility yellow on the top half of the back sights. Those 2 things really improved the accuracy of the gun.