Diana RWS 350 Magnum
by B.B. Pelletier
A reader named RWS 350 asked for this post, but several others chimed in with interest, too. So, for all of you who like the big springers, here we go!
Diana's most powerful airgun!
Before the Diana RWS 350 Magnum came along, the 48/52/54 sidelever (same powerplant in different stocks) was the top Diana gun. But the long-stroke 350 breakbarrel produces even more power than those big bruisers.
It's big but not heavy!
At 48", the 350 Magnum is one of the longest air rifles on the market. But tipping the scales at just 8.2 lbs., it is medium weight - for the power. Being a long-stroke springer, it kicks hard, but not as hard as the Webley Patriot, which is also sold as the Beeman Kodiak.
Velocity and power
The .22 caliber rifle I tested got 935 f.p.s. with RWS Hobby pellets, 870 with RWS Superpoints and 675 with Beeman Kodiaks. To get the 1050 f.p.s. that RWS advertises, you'll have to shoot a lightweight pellet with a synthetic skirt, which I don't recommend doing in a spring rifle of this power - not enough cushion for the piston. So, the difference between this gun and the advertised velocity for the Kodiak/Patriot is nonexistent. In my testing, Superpoints delivered the most energy, at just under 24.5 foot-pounds. Crosman Premiers were the most accurate, with Kodiaks a close second.
Shooting technique
Being a long-stroke springer, the 350 takes a lot of technique to shoot accurately. You have to float it very lightly to realize all the accuracy it has, which is a lot if you do your part. Do not grasp the stock in any way, but rest it on your open palm and allow the rifle to move when it fires. Don't grip the pistol grip tightly or press the buttpad into your shoulder. In this respect, shooting the 350 is identical to shooting the Kodiak/Patriot. My five-shot groups averaged 0.35" at 25 yards, which is almost as good as I can do with an RWS sidelever. I had an RWS 450 scope on mine, but one of the new Leapers TS scopes would be a better choice today, because they are more rugged and have clearer optics.
Mounting a scope
This is a weak point on all Diana RWS airguns. Their scope rail has three shallow depressions that are not deep enough to hold a recoil stop pin in a set of rings. There is a large-headed screw at the rear of the rail, and you may be tempted to butt the rear ring against the head (I've done it, too), but it will not take the repeated stress of recoil. If you use it that way, you can shear off the screw head! The solution, which I read about years ago, is to hang the scope stop pin in front of the rail, where it can bear against the full depth of the aluminum rail. That leaves half the front ring (assuming a two-piece ring set) hanging off the rail, which is a good reason to use a one-piece mount on an RWS airgun. I used a medium-height Beeman 5030 scope ring with the RWS scope, but any good non-adjustable ring should work. Just make sure you match the ring height and diameter to the scope used. The RWS scope ramp doesn't give much clearance over the top of the compression tube.

The Diana scope rail is not very conducive to scope mounting. Don't butt the rear ring against the large screw head at the right. Instead, hang the stop pin in front of the scope rail, so it has something to bear against.
Cocking effort
Cocking a 350 is as easy as cocking a Beeman R1 and just a little harder than cocking one of the big Diana RWS sidelevers. At just 36 lbs., it's nowhere near the effort required for a Patriot (50 lbs.) or the even more difficult Gamo 1250 (60 lbs.). Yet, this rifle has power equivalent to those airguns. The ballbearing detent that keeps the barrel closed is very easy to overcome, so you don't need to slap the muzzle to break the barrel open.
Calibers
The 350 Magnum comes in both .177 and .22. If you buy this rifle in .177, you'll throw out so much power in that caliber. It's like buying a new Corvette with a V6 engine (if they made one) for better fuel economy. However, this is just my opinion, and you know what they say about opinions!
Good trigger
The trigger can be adjusted to be very nice BUT YOU HAVE TO READ THE OWNER'S MANUAL! If you don't, you'll be turning screws for years without a clue as to what they do. Properly set up, a Diana trigger can be as crisp as a Rekord, and that's saying a lot.
It's a classic airgun!
The 350 magnum is large but not heavy. It's powerful but easy to cock. It's difficult to scope but very accurate when you do. Besides all that, it feels right when held and shot. It has all the earmarks of a classic air rifle that will endure the test of time.
216 Comments:
I have no experience with springers...and since Ive heard they "recoil both directions" would you hang the stop off the barrel or stock side of the mount?
You mention accuracy with the RWS side lever guns as being very good. I recently bought a RWS 52 in 177 and have been trying different pellets. My last string with Crossman Premier Heavy Pellets was five shots at 10 yards in what looks like a hole smaller than a dime. . Perhaps I am getting better but my sense is that the Crossman pellets are more accurate than my other pellets. I have been shooting Crossman Cooperheads (readily availably in the local stores) and Gamo Match, real good until I used the Premiers. I would be interested in your comments in two areas, could you offer an explanation as to why some pellets are seemingly more accurate than others? And I am using heavy weight pellets, could you comment on the value of using heavy vs lighter ones in this air rifle? One final comment, I found to my surprise that the pellet trap I was using (Gamo Funnel Trap), and worked well with my old Sheridan, started to come apart when I began shooting with my RWS 52. The first ten pellets bent the trap deflector and then started to dent out the back of the trap and the metal looks like it is beginning to come apart. I have since acquired a trap suitable for 22 long rifle and while the trap is fine, the pellets seem to almost disintegrate in this trap. I had no idea that this rifle was so powerful.
RWS 52 owner,
You have said a lot and asked for more than you may realize.
I will address the pellet weight/airgun type question early next week.
I will address the pellet trap issue separately. Thank goodness you were observant enough to see what was happening. I have heard tales of shooters putting holes through cinderblock walls and destroying appliances on the other side before realizing what they were doing. There is more at work than just the power of the airgun.
Thanks,
B.B.
Thanks for the response and I will look forward to the future comments on these and other issues. The more I read on this Blog, the more I learn.
RWS 52 owner
Thanks B.B. for another great article. I was particulary interested in your comments on the scope stop, as I have an RWS gun. Sure enough I butted the rear ring up against the large screw at the back of the rail. It seemed like a good solution, but I don't imagine I would have been very happy with it had the screw sheared off.
However hanging the scope ring over the front of the rail doesn't seem very appealing either. I wonder if you could buy a screw made of high shear strength steel for the back of the rail that would handle the recoil. Or maybe try to deepen the depressions in the rail to accomodate a scope stop.
jw
jw,
Undoubtedly either of your suggestions would work, but I'll recommend a variation. Drill a new hole and use that. But be very careful that you don't drill into the receiver tube!
Diana in Germany makes aperture sights with bases that match the roughened surface of the ramp. They interlock and work well.
Perhaps our other readers have recommendations of their own?
B.B.
Hi B.B.,
On the topic of "What range should you zero your scope?"
Can you give me your wisdom on what two ranges you should adjust the RWS 350 Magnum?
Please give me the two ranges for the following air rifles as well:
Gamo CFX
Gamo 1250
Thanks!
Bees Keeper
Bees Keeper,
I'd sight both rifles in for the first intersection at 20 yards. The CF-X would cross again around 33 yards or so. The 1250 would cross at 40 yards. Somewhere in between the near and far distance they would each hit about a pellet's diameter above the aim point.
B.B.
Hi B.B
I'm looking for a decent gun that can take a black bird out of comission from 70-90 feet away.
Any suggestions?
Maybe you could do a entry on the legacy1000 if possible.Because it is a ben/sheridan I know it will be at least at what it as advertised to be as a good gun but I would definately like to know more before buying.
black birds,
At 70-90 feet a Benjamin Sheridan 392 should do the trick on a blackbird.
B.B.
Legacy 1000,
The problem is I don't have one of these rifles and they are not a common airgun. I have held them but never tested them. So it's going to be some time (months) before I can get one to test. If you can wait that long okay, but I'm hoping one of our readers will step up and tell us about theris.
B.B.
What about the beeman ss1000?It SAYS it shoots 800 fps in 22 for only $182 with scope.I was also wondering if anyone could list any other models that sell for under $300 that have a max fps in 22 of at least 800 or better that compare to the legacy1000.The beeman ss1000 and the RWS 34 are the other guns with similar price and power.Like I said I am bassically looking for a powerfull air rifle that has a max fps in 22 cal of at least 800.Those 3 are my best choices right now and would like some comparisons of them,I would rather by american if possible so the beeman ss1000 or the legacy1000 seem my most likely picks.
Once I get some good insight on which would be the best buy Then I will make my choice.
Once I get some good insight on which would be the best buy Then I will make my choice.
Whoops I did not mean to double that post.....
Beeman SS1000
Beeman's Sportsman Series 1000 is a Chinese-made rifle that I do plan to test this year. I saw it at the SHOT Show and was impressed with the external quality. It appears to be a copy of a Norika (Spanish) design, which would be roughly the same as a Gamo.
With a Chinese airgun, accuracy is always the concern. While they CAN rifles barrels well, they don't always do so. I note that Pyramyd says the accuracy at 33 feet is one-third of an inch, which is pretty poor ifor this price range of guns.
The Spanish had the same problem 10 years ago, and they learned their lesson. I believe the Chinese will learn as well. As I found in the test of the Marksman 2004, another Chinese gun, they can make a barrel when they want to.
B.B.
I'm new to posting so I hope I got it right. I have a gamo 1250 in .22 and I mounted a big scope on it so the original scope stop pin bent back with a few hundred shots, what scope stop must I get to stop this? I have a one peice high mount on it. sorry for asking in the wrong subject guys.
Then the leagacy 1000 or the rws 34 are mostlikely now thanks for tellin me about the beeman.Ya my crosman powermaster sg can be more accurate than that and it is a $70 gun!Isnt as powerfull but it can hit 700 fps in .177 which is good for $70.
It seems that the main difference between the RWS 350 and the 48/52/54 is the cocking mechanism. I find no other obvious merit of one gun versus another. Am I missing something?
Regarding scope mounting on Diana models...would a Full Length Integral Mount work to stop slippage?
Finally, is there a formula to extrapolate the velocity if the knowns are muzzel velocity and a known pellet weight? For example, if a gun will shoot at 1000fps with an 8 grain pellet then what will the velocity be if a 12 grain pellet is used?
8g is two-thirds of 12g so 666fps is two-thirds of 1000fps. That's my guess though I'm definitely not definite, so to speak.
Jim
BB, REALY GLAD YOU DID THIS POST.
OF THE 6 SPRING PELLET GUNS I OWN MY 350 IN .22 CAL IS THE MOST CONSISTENT. I HAVE ONE OF THE NEW LEEPERS 3X9 SCOPES ON IT. WITH JSB EXACTS THIS GUN HAS SMASHING POWER AND WILL ALMOST ALWAYS SHOOT 3SHOTS IN 3/8" AT 20 YDS.FROM A SOLID REST. I THINK THAT 16 GR JSB PELLET IS THE IDEL WEIGHT FOR THIS GUN.I LIKE THE BALL BEARING FOR LOCKING THE BAREL I THINK IT'S THE BEST DESIGN EVER FOR A BREAK BARREL. AFTER ABOUT 2500 SHOTS THIS GUN IS VERY EASY TO COCK BUT SEEMS TO HAVE LOST NO POWER FROM WHEN IT WAS NEW. I DO FEEL THE KODIAK PELLET AT 21 GRS.IS A LITTLE HEAVY AND MAY BE HARD ON THE SPRING. I'D LIKE YOUR FEEDBACK ON THAT. I THINK THIS GUN IS WELL WORTH THE PRICE WHEN YOU CONSIDER ITS POWER,ACCURACY AND QUALITY OF MANFACTURE.
BB,
How about a post on the gamo raptors pellets.You can talk about their accuracy and increase of speed.Thanks and keep up the great work.
CF-X guy
Guys,
You don't have to guess about velocity. The formula is given in the article "What is Muzzle Energy?" on this website.
Find it at
http://pyramydair.com/site/articles/formulas/
You don't even have to do the math. Pyramyd Air's webmaster has set it up so all you do is plug in the variables and hit the button.
The RWS 350 magnum is a breakbarrel, while the 48/52/54 are sidelevers. There is a world of difference between those guns. The sidelevers are short and wide; the breakbarrel is very long and thin. The breakbarrel is a long-stroke powerplant. The sidelevers are short-stroke. They feel completely different when fired. The 350 Magnum is more powerful than the sidelevers. The 350 kicks more than the sidelevers because it has a long piston stroke. So it requires more technique to shoot accurately than the sidelevers.
Regarding scope mounting - no amount of clamping pressure alone can stop a scope mount from moving under recoil. There has to be a positive scope stop to retard movement.
B.B.
CF-X guy,
Believe it or not, I am working on the Gamo Raptor pellets in conjunction with the CF-X rifle. So you will get them both at the same time. Don't hold your breath, though. I doubt they are very accurate with that much speed.
B.B.
BB,
That is great.If they are not good{gamo raptors}I think ill buy them to make a necklace.Now,
If they say that the gamo raptor pellets increase 25% velocity,then the CF-X should go 1250fps,since 250 is 25% of 1000fps,Right?
BB
I wrote what is above this.
CF-X guy
Check me on this, but assuming Gamo tested the CF-X with 6.7g pellets to come up with 1000fps that would mean that the CF-X has an estimated energy of about 15ft. lbs. A number comparable to many like guns.
According to the energy calculator a gun with 15ft. lbs. should shoot a 5g pellet at a speed of 1162 fps. That's all assuming the 15 ft. lbs. is true.
I am interested to see what the actual tested numbers are. I don't think the CFX puts out 15ft lbs, I have been using 14 ft lbs for my figuring. Still that would be too fast for anything to maintain reasonable accuracy, wouldn't it?
Waiting for real numbers,
dsw
CF-X guy,
The CF-X may not get 1,000 with standard pellets, and that's what the3 "25 percent" better claim is based on.
Let's wait for the actual numbers and we'll know what is and what isn't.
B.B.
dsw,
I believe you are closer to the mark. I will post all the numbers I get, because I know that will be of supreme interest.
Fo me, however, it matters most how accurate the pellets are. A miss at high speed is still a miss.
B.B.
Something of interest...
Air Arms advertizes the TX200 MkIII at 930fps in the .177cal. and 16ft lbs.
According to the energy calculator they must have used a 8.3gr pellet. I would have thought a hobby pellet at around 6.5 to 7gr would have been used.
Anyway, 16ft lbs from an underlever springer seems to be high doesn't it? What's the difference in this gun to the CFX?
Also Webley/Scotts Tomahawk rated at 17.5ft lbs. and 1000fps would be shooting 7.8gr pellet. Closer to the hobby pellet but still heavier than 6.5 to 7gr whats the deal?
dsw
I am trying to keep my velocity down to around 800fps, but Gamo does not advertize muzzle energy making it difficult not to guess.
dsw
BB,
When you say that a pellet is not accurate,at what distance does this occure{Being unaccurate} or is it not accurate at all distances?
a very confused
CF-X guy
CF-X guy,
Accuracy degrades with distance for every pellet. So it's harder to see the stinkers at 10 yards, but easier at 25 yards and very easy at 35 yards and beyond.
B.B.
BB,
Thanks,now I understand what you mean.If the gamo raptors turn out to be "inaccurate",does that mean that I can use them for 15yard to shoot at tins?
CF-X guy
CF-X guy,
I'm pretty sure they'll do that with no problem.
B.B.
CFX guy,
Pellets with a diabolo ( hourglass shaped) design are not ment to be shot over the speed of sound. They will not stabilize well at this speed, and as a result accuracy is lost. At sea level the speed of sound is 1100 fps and some. If "solid bullets" are used, they have to be shot at extreme speeds, to "kind of stabilize" them. 1250 fps is a good number. To really shoot "bullets" well, the twist rate in the air rifles barrel needs more turns and a steeper twist rate. To spin the "bullet" faster. I think
Jason
BB and Jason,
Thanks for the info.
I guess ill order a bunch of those gamo raptors just to see.
But BB,
Where I live there is only one place I can get pellets.I can get crosman copperheads or daisy precision max pointed pellets.I buy the daisy because the copper head pellets dont do well in my cfx.Are the daisies good pellets for $3.00?
And scince they and the copper heads are the only ones ive tried,how good are they compared to an accurate pellet like the premire or kodiak?
CF-X guy
well everyone, can some one point me in the right direction for the best scope stop with a pin that fits a gamo 1250 in .22 and wont give in to the recoil. the one that came on the rifle bent back because the main body is made of plastic I'm just trying to stop the slip for more than acouple hundred shots. I hope B.B. can answer me or someone with knowledge on this issue.
Here you go.
http://www.pyramydair.com/cgi-bin/accessory.pl?accessory_id=359
B.B.
BB,
How about a post on the gamo pt-80 pellet pistol.Thank you BB pelletier.
The Pellet Master
I hope that the last comment will be deleted.
BB,
How does a daisy pellet compare to a kodiak at 50 feet.Are they both accurate at that distance?
Or will the kodiak still surpass it in that distance?
CF-X guy
thanks for the help BB
Pellet Master,
I'll try to do the Gamo 80 for you. I'll have to see if I've ever tested this gun or not. I know I've tested the P23, and the PT 80 is similar so I don't know whether I've done it or not.
B.B.
CF-X guy,
I'll have what you want in tomorrow's post.
B.B.
BB,
Thanks.
I have a question.I have a friend that has a crosman co2 air rifle from the 1970s that uses 2 co2 bottles.The crony says it goes 1567fps to 1600fps.And the power is noticiable too.I know that it is powerful because its stonger than the gamo 1250 huuricane he has.What is this model?and how is it possible?
CF-X guy
CF-X guy,
For several reasons, such velocity is impossible with CO2. I suspect the Chrony is malfunctioning. Shoot the gun into 2 two by fours. If it goes that fast, it will shoot clear through both of them.
B.B.
BB,
The crosman shoots through an old steel trashcan that almost an inch.I think it might go that fast because the power is stronger than my cf-x and his hurricane 1250.If you know a model said to do this then tell me the name.
CF-X guy
CF-X guy,
I don't know what this means, "The crosman shoots through an old steel trashcan that almost an inch."
No Crosman ever made can out-shoot either of your guns. The only possibility is that you have an 1100 Trapmaster than someone has tweaked.
B.B.
BB,
Ill tell my friend its pretty mutch impossible to get 1600fps out of anco2 or airguns.Thanks for the info.
CF-X guy
I mean the condor in .177 could hit 1600 fps but that is about it.
BB Pelletier,
You made a mistake because you said than an air gun can reach 1000fps and no airgun ever could do that.I am now 78 years old and have the most powerful airgun of all,The sheridan blue streak.
I hope you understand your errors.
Mr.Hunider
Mr. Hunidr,
I hate to break this to you but your Sheridan is not the most powerful air rifle. Your rifle develops about 14 foot-pounds, while a Condor or Career 707 develops over 65 foot-pounds.
And 1,000 f.p.s. is not impossible for an airgun. I have seen 1,480 and Gamo has just launched a new pellet that their 1250 Hunter can shoot to 1,600 f.p.s. It's already been featured on TV with a chronograph test done live as proof.
B.B.
BB Pelletier,
I really thought an airgun cant shoot 100fps but thank you for the aclaration and im very sorry.Im kind of old and in my time the sheridan was a great air rifle.One question,In what channel does an air rifle get 1600fps?
And can I download the test from the air rifle going 1600fps on the web?
If so,Where?
Mr. Hunidr
Mr. Hunidr,
The program was run on Shooting USA, which is on the Outdoor Living Network. Jim Scoutten is the host. Their website is:
http://www.shootingusa.com
If you can't get that channel, contact Gamo at
http://www.gamo-airguns.com
and look for information about the new Gamo Raptor pellet. I don't know whether you can download the test, but I would contact Gamo, if I were you.
But 1,600 f.p.s. is not the limit for pellets. When I test this Raptor pellet in an AirForce Condor air rifle I'm expecting it to top 1,800 f.p.s., because the Condor is so much more powerful. The Condor already gets over 1,200 f.p.s. with normal .22 caliber lead pellets, and it's the gun that I saw shoot a lightweight .177 pellet to 1,480 f.p.s.
Now I must add here that pellets travelling faster than 1,000 f.p.s. are not very accurate. I just finished a test of the Gamo CF-X rifle that shot the Raptor to 1,153 f.p.s. and they weren't accurate at all.
http://www.pyramydair.com/blog/2006/02/gamo-cf-x-field-test.html
For the record, your Sheridan is still a very good air rifle. I have three of them!
B.B.
BB Pelletier,
Thank you for the information.Ill contact gamo.Im exited to see an air rifle go over 1000fps!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mr. Hunidr
BB Pelletier,
I Bought a 1000fps rifle called the gamo shadow 1000.I want to know if I can use a pellet that I saw and kind of liked in it.Its called the eujin and they are over 16 grains.Do they work on the gamo shadow 1000?Thank you.
Mr. Hunidr
Mr. Hunidr,
You can use an Eun Jim in a Shadow 1000 but it won't got much over 600 f.p.s., if that fast. It may be accurate out to 30 feet, but don't expect much at 60 feet and beyond because the pellet isn't stabilized.
B.B.
Mr. Hunidr,
You can use an Eun Jim in a Shadow 1000 but it won't got much over 600 f.p.s., if that fast. It may be accurate out to 30 feet, but don't expect much at 60 feet and beyond because the pellet isn't stabilized.
B.B.
BB Pelletier,
What is the best pellet then{in the heavyweight class}.
Mr. Hunidr
Mr. Hunidr,
Probably the Beeman Kodiak.
B.B.
BB,
why are they making the Raptor Pellet if accuracy goes out the window at the speeds they travel?
Like you have said how much does speed count if you miss your target?
My thoughts are that the 1000fps+ rating is usefull in determaning how heavy a pellet can be used to reach a premium energy level at the point of impact.
the raptor pellet would be too light to transfer an effective amount of energy to the point of impact at any speed wouldnt it? If you hit it, that is.
Maybe this pellet is designed for lower power guns like in the 400 to 600fps range?
dsw
Some countries in continental Europe have even lower limits of airgun (rifle) power than the 12 ft-lbs in Britain (above which a firearms license is required). Could be that Gamo's extra-light pellets have these markets in mind.
Brit Visitor,
Makes sense,I would like to try them in my Marksman repeater spring pistol. I think it shoots at 200fps or so.
dsw
I think it's at least partly advertising hype. They hope people will look at it and say "25% faster! wow, faster=better" and then buy them. They would probably be good for some of the lower powered spring pistols though.
i have a rws m5. what is the ballistic info on the gamo raptor pellets?
RWS P5,
I haven't tested the Raptor in the P5 but a guess would put it at 675 to 700 f.p.s. Finally RWS gets to the velocity they have been advertising for five years!
B.B.
BB Pelletier,
I need your help.Im not good in the computer thing{my grandson is writing what im saying}and dont know how to get info when my grandson is not home.I want to know if you can make a post for the remington genesis.I want a post because Im thinking about getting it for my grandson so he can shoot with me{he is exited as he writes this}.Thank you BB Pelletier and Keep the good stuff coming.
Mr. Hunidr
Mr. Hunidr,
It will probably be a long time before I do a Remington Genesis or Benjamin Legacy (someone else asked for that). I do the mainstream airguns as fast as I can, but the Genesis just doesn't have the demand of a Gamo Shadow 1000. I will try to do it, but I expect you will have made your purchase by then.
Just looking at the numbers, I'd say the Genesis is very similar to the Gamo Shadow 1000.
B.B.
BB Pelletier,
Thank you.I will wait for the post even if it takes a lot because I need your opinion about it.Thanks again
Mr.Hunidr
BB,
My granpa,Mr Hunidr,died 3 days ago because of a heart attack.So he wont be writing with me to youe blog any more.Still,he left me the money to buy the remington genesis and he wanted me to have an air rifle like he did.So please,could you make the post for the remington genesis?
Mr.Hunidr's grandson
Mr. Hunidr's grandson,
I'm sorry to learn of your grandfather's passing. He seemed so interested in airguns in the short time I knew him.
I am working on getting a Remington Genesis to test, but as I told your grandfather, it will be some time before you see the report. It takes time to obtain a gun then test it, to say nothing of writing the report. The Genesis is not a mainstream air rifle, as I explained to your grandfather, so I cannot extrapolate from some other known airgun, like I did with the Gamo CF-X. I'll just have to wait and see the gun for myself.
If you are interested in this rifle I will report on it, but you will have to be patient.
Once again, please accept my sympathy for the loss of your grandfather.
B.B.
BB,
Thank you for the support.I will have patience on the report.And I just want to tell you that you made my granpas afternoons the best he had{he sayed that}he really enjoyed me reading this blog to him.Belive it or not I read every single post to him.Once again thank you for the support.
Mr.Hunidr's granson
BB,
Also,my grandpa had this sheridan air rifle that he says he bought in 1949.He tells me that his sheridan was one of the firsts.It does not seem to have an item number.He sayed that the sheridans from those years did not have them but he was confident that he bought it in 1949.How much is this worth?Im not going to sell it because he left it to me but I want to know.
Mr.Hunidr's grandson
Mr.Hunidr's grandson,
First you need to identify which model Sheridan you have. Do a search on the keyword Sheridan (in the blog) and you'll pull up all the related articles. From them you will discover which model you have.
B.B.
BB,
I checked and its a thumb safety 1949 sheridan.
Mr.Hunidr's grandson
Hey friend
I purchased an 350 rifle a couple of years back, but can't seem to shoot it, it always misfire, it feel like if you try to cock the rifle some thing is moving inside. This is my third gun and the first German made, also the worst gun I've purchased, the rest of my guns is either made by Chinese, or Turkey but working wonderfully. The bad thing is I seem misplaced the sale recept and can't return the gun to the store where I purchased it, and we don't have any body who can repair air rifle in where I'm staying. Any advises would be greatly appreciated.
Rocky,
You don't mention what country you live in, so I'll assume you are in the U.S. You should return the gun to RWS for repairs. It sounds like something has broken.
So what if they charge you something for the repair? Right now all you have is a broken airgun - and an expensive one, at that!
B.B.
What kind of scope mount WILL hold up on an RWS 350, particularly if you want to use a scope with a 50mm objective lens such as a Leapers 3x9x50?
Why not just use a Leapers scope? They have the reputation of being the toughest scopes on the block, and the TS scopes are tougher still.
Pick the Leapers you like and use it.
B.B.
Dear BB
Did you mean to say Leapers "mount", and not "scope"?
Please, just spell it out for me - WHICH Leapers mount would YOU use for fixing the Leapers model #395AOMDL scope to an RWS 350 in .22?
My apologies!
I read that as scope, not scope mount.
Okay - ANY scope mount will "hold up" on the 350 Magnum. What you need is a scope mount that has a recoil stop that will work. I spelled out the problem in the post. There is nowhere on a Diana ramp to tie a scope stop to.
Re-read the caption in the photo. You have to hang the scope stop pin over the front of the ramp to work correctly.
Diana makes mounts with a texture that interlocks with the rough surface of their ramps, but nobody imports them into the U.S.
We really need a better solution than this, because you have to hang part of the scope MOUNT over the front of the ramp, for the stop pin to rest against the front of the ramp.
What you need is any scope mount that uses a pin as a scope stop. It needs to be at least medium height, if not higher, for the objective bell to clear the compression tube.
This mount should work
http://www.pyramydair.com/cgi-bin/accessory.pl?accessory_id=827
B.B.
Thanks B.B. it's an Accushot mount then for a 30mm tube
As long as your scope has a 30mm tube, then, yes it is. Please get a mount that matches your tube diameter.
B.B.
BB i have a quick question. My oldest brother has a RWS 48, he really like's it. My younger brother has a 54. I've been looking at the 350 or the 52. Can you tell me which you think is more accurate, better quality, and which is worth the money.
I don't really want to spend the money to buy the 54, i don't need recoiless. With the 350 being break barrel, will the barrel eventually sag. Does it really have as much power as it says, and how does the power compare to the 48 and 52.
I want to get the 52 over the 48 for the upgraded stock.
So basically please compare the 52 and 350. Thanks
dcmcmike,
Both the 52 and 350 are worth the money and equally well made.
Breakbarrels never bend their barrels unless someone intentionally wrecks them.
The 52 is more accurate.
The 350 is as powerful as the claims.
My choice is the 52 in .22 caliber.
B.B.
Thanx for the help, gald to know which is more accurate.
Wischo 55 with 11 mm rail. No scope stop pin depression. Need scope stop. Whot 2 do…???? JB…??
JB,
Clamp and hope or drill a hole in the spring cylinder (ouch!)
B.B.
I got a Diana 350 magnum today. And i'm NOT impressed. The rearsight is moving up and down about 1-2 mm. The trigger is plastic! And the stock is very thinly coatet. NOT what i expected from a gun this expensive! Why is it so bad? Is this Dianas standart?? I really hope it delivers regarding to power...Or i'm sure i'll cry :-P
Bjorn,
The rear sight isn't supposed to move. Is it dialed up so far the adjustment screw has come loose?
B.B.
BB, Those freakin squirrels have got to go! Is the 350 a good selection for getting rid of those pesky rodents in a large backyard? For rabbits, squirrels, possums and birds is there another rifle in the $275 to $325 range that would be better? After reading your posts I'm totally messed up on what to do about a scope. I'd like to have one and would prefer to pay under $100 for the scope and mount. But, do you even need a scope at 60'? Finally, is the .22 caliber the way to go? Thanks BB!
Hello B.B.
I am interested in 4 different pellet rifles, they are:
RWS 350 - 369.99
RWS 48 - 365.85
RWS 52 - 399.95
Gamo 1250 - 399.95
Now, all of these have a lifetime warranty, good power, and are springers. I don't want a PCP because of the cost of all the extra gear needed, as well as a lack of a lifetime warranty in most.
I have two questions, and one problem.
1. I am pretty sure, but not positive, is the 48 the same as the 52 except with a lower grade wood for the stock?
The problem I am having is that I can only find CTC accuracy on the Gamo 1250, which is quite nice, .2"@90'. I can't find anything on the accuracy of the RWS models.
2. Could you have a "shoot-out" between these rifles, on there overall quality, accuracy, usability, and power?
Sorry I have 2 more questions now.
Can you list your CTC accuracy on these rifles?
Finally, are there any rifles other then these, in this price range/power range, with a lifetime warranty that you would recommend, spring or PCP, as long as its not too far out of this price range inc. gear needed?
Thanks!
ENIGMAFIED,
Luckily for you I have tested all 4 guns. Forget the Gamo 1250. It's TWICE as hard to cock as the others and it DOES NOT achieve 0.20" groups at 30 yards very often. More like 0.50", and it takes a lot of technique to do that.
The RWS 350 can shoot as accurately as the 48/52, which you have correctly surmised is the same rifle in different stocks, but it takes BUCKETS of shooting technique to do!
That leaves the 48/52 - the weakest of the 4 rifles. They can shoot sub one-inch groups at 50 yards on a perfect day. They honestly take only 33 pounds of cocking force but they are more forgiving in the holding department. That's not to say they don't require technique, because they do.
Remember this, a pellet that hits is infinitely more effective than one that misses with twice the power.
B.B.
Thanks B.B.,
BTW, I am interested in all of these rifles in .22 caliber, and the Gamo does not appear to be offered in .22 on your site.
Quality wise though, they are all roughly the same?
I am having trouble grasping this concept of all the technique required. It seems to me as though all the rifles have about the same accuracy, but the user will be accurate more often with the 48/52, which really doesn't tell me a whole lot. I think I need more explanation in this department.
Thanks!
ENIGMAFIED,
You need to read my past posts on accuracy with spring air rifles. There I explain about technique needed for accuracy. Both the Gamo and RWS 350 need a lot more technique than either of the sidelevers.
Power by itself means nothing. Power with accuracy is what you want. All the RWS guns have accuracy, but one requires more technique than the others.
Tom Gaylord calls it the "artillery hold." It means holding the gun as lightly as possible so it is free to move and recoil as much as possible when it fires.
It's very similar to shooting an M1911A1 Colt. Many shooters think the gun is inaccurate, but with the right technique, it wins!
B.B.
Hello again B.B.,
Now, I have decided on the rifle, but I need to know which scope/scope mount you recommend for the RWS 48.
I looked in the blog for information on the scope mounts and only found your article on scope mounting height. It talks a bit about scopes mounts, but not much.
Under the accesories, there is only 1 scope listed, and no scope mounts.
Thanks for your advice B.B.
For the RWS 48 I would get a 4 to 12 or a 4 to 16 variable-power scope.
I don't care for mil dot reticles, but they are very popular now, so you decide. I like a straight duplex, which the AirForce scope does have. It's a big scope which means it has to be mounted high to clear the compression tube.
One consideration is the loading port. On the 48. its a sliding compression chamber and a lot of shooters freak out if the scope objective overhangs that area. If you want to keep it free for the best access to the loading port, stick with an overall scope length of less than 12 inches.
B.B.
Hi everyone.
It is quite interesting to read some of the comments. Here are some things which might be useful to most of ppl posting here.
1. Accuracy - guys two words - more practice. I studied on old model of Baikal (crappy Russian bbgun) and trust me when I say this any gun with given enough skill will hit right on the balls.
2. Velocity myth - faster is better??!!! Hey you should have paid attention in physics class, once pellet breaks sound speed it will not do much good because you won’t hit a cow. Most of the high end brea