FX Crown, Maverick, Dreamline, Reviews

Works great.. fits great couldn’t work any better

Nothing

Well-made, reliable. Durable (I fumbled and dropped one 4 feet onto concrete and it still works fine)

Nothing

A bit expensive, but then quality always costs more. I am still using FX magazines I bought over ten years ago. Remember, FX builds the pellet advancing mechanism into the magazine, not the rifle, so it is always going to be more expensive compared to other manufacturer’s magazines where the rifle advances the pellet.

Factory original, works great, bought 2 extra.

Works like it is supposed to.

Higher capacity than most brands.

More robust design.

These magazines are light, and do not feel the most durable. Not all will fit the breech and I had to dremel 1 mag a bit to make it fit better. The outside little o ring for tensioning the magazine seems a bit flimsy in concept.

The shot count

price

buy at least 2 extra because you will do a lot of shooting

it works

It works

I'd rather have the original FX magazine.

Works great...A bit pricey...Well it IS an FX, so....

Lower price...Hold more ammo...

Works like it should and easy to load

Nothing as far as with Pyramyd Air but I think FX could lower the price some.

I purchased the extra clip just to carry along on my outing's and it's nice to know it's there if you need it.

Thank you very much. We made a very good deal. Have a chance, thank you.

high round count

nothing

Seems to be a decent design except for the fact that if you do not have a scope mount height of 1.75, the magazine will not fit into the Crown and the top hits the scope. I could get a taller scope mount, but then the scope will be a bit high and not allow for the best check weld.

Create a mazagine that will work with 1.5 in and lower scope mounts .... when magazine height is approx 1.5 in or less.

If the FX Crown is a precision air rifle, then I would think that it would cater to a precision cheek weld as opposed to a compromised cheek weld so that the shooter can use its magazines.

much easier and faster to load and almost $30 cheaper then the stock magazine also very well built

nothing

can be loaded in half the time than the standard mag well worth the money

You can load it faster because you can use two hands and it is $30 less than the original. It works well without any modification.

Im not saying it should be changed, but I would prefer a metal case over the plastic.

With the original magazine, the spring tension was too tight and the JSB MKII pellets would hang up a bit on the edge of the rotor. FX Masterclass on YouTube with Ernest Rowe has a video on how to remedy this. After the modification its easier to load and cycles smoother. I have about 4500 shots through two magazines with no issues.
Although you should modify the original, I like the fact that the case is not plastic and is always sealed when loading to keep out debris. Time will tell on how well the side-shot holds up.

easy to load, cycles better.

none

good price.