by Tom Gaylord, The Godfather of Airguns™
Writing as B.B. Pelletier
This report covers:
• The 4 modern smallbore calibers
• The point I’m making
• But how did the calibers we have today come into being?
• Airguns are being developed, too
• Birmingham, England, 1905
This question was asked by blog reader, Joe, many weeks ago. He wondered why the airgun calibers we have today are the sizes they are. This is an open-ended question that will never be fully answered, but maybe I can put a small part of it into perspective for you today.
The 4 modern smallbore calibers
We’ll begin by listing the 4 calibers that are currently on the market in the smallbore category. They are .177 (4.5mm), .20 (5mm), .22 (5.5mm) and .25 (6.35mm). These are the 4 we have today. But as recently as 1948, Crosman offered their CG gallery guns in .21 caliber — shooting a proprietary round lead ball. Before that, up into the 1930s, the Quackenbush company offered pellet guns that were smoothbores in 20-1/2 caliber.
From the left — .177, .20, .22 and .25. All are domed pellets made by Crosman.
The Bullseye Pistol introduced the .12-caliber round ball that lasted from 1923 through several incarnations of Sharpshooter pistols made through the 1980s and also with the Daisy company in their Targeteer pistols, which were made in the 1930s and ’40s. While these pistols mostly used No. 6 lead shotgun shot, Daisy did manufacture copper-plated steel Tiny BBs in .12 caliber for a time.
Daisy made special .118 (.12-caliber) steel BBs for their Targeteer pistols.
The Crosman, Quackenbush and Daisy offerings were designed to limit the supply of ammo to their own companies. What they did, instead, was limit the number of buyers willing to go out on a limb for a gun that shot ammo that was hard to get. Ask someone who owns a gun chambered for Remington 5mm rimfire or Winchester WRF cartridges how easy it is to buy ammo today.
The point I’m making
The point I want to make is that it is very risky to introduce a new airgun caliber. Even for major manufacturers such as Crosman, Gamo, Weihrauch or Hatsan, it would be a huge risk to bring out a new caliber for which there were no pellets. The pellets would have to be made, they would have to be distributed and dealers would have to stock them before the new caliber could be successful. And nobody’s going to do that unless the new caliber offers something the existing calibers don’t already have. The .20-caliber pellet has struggled from 1948, when Sheridan introduced it to the world, until the present day, where it’s in last place among the 4 smallbore calibers. It wasn’t until the powerplants began developing reasonable velocities that the .25 caliber finally took off.
What you may not realize is that lead diabolo pellets are harder to make than many kinds of firearm ammunition. While they appear simpler becauser they are made from one homogeneous material, the precision to which they’re made goes beyond that of the most particular bullet makers. According to Dr. Robert Beeman, the H&N engineers told him that if we want pellets to become any more precise, we’ll have to control them down at the molecular level. And pellets are made by the millions — not in small hundred-thousand-unit batches like precision firearm bullets.
There were some experiments with a .14-caliber pellet several decades ago. Pellets that small offer the advantages of using less materials, which, with the price of lead rising all the time, is important. They also allow smaller powerplants to shoot them at reasonable velocities for things like target practice and plinking. Target shooters want holes in paper, and plinkers want to hit their cans and plastic army men. Neither group cares that much about the size of the pellet. So, why didn’t .14-caliber pellets come to market?
They didn’t because of the overwhelming inertia of the .177/4.5mm pellet. World Cup and Olympic competition is all based on .177 caliber, and the enormous investment in equipment is too large for a newcomer pellet to overcome. All the scoring equipment, targets and guns would have to be changed if this caliber were to change. That isn’t likely to happen, any more than Olympic swimmers are likely to start competing in salt water!
But how did the calibers we have today come into being?
This hasn’t addressed Joe’s question, yet, which is why are the calibers we have the ones they are? Why isn’t there a .27-caliber or a .19-caliber pellet?
To learn about that, we need to go back to about the year 1845. That was when the French inventor Louis N. Flobert employed the brand-new explosive priming compound that was being used in the new percussion firearms to propel a projectile all by itself. He had to use small projectiles because the priming compound didn’t have the power that gunpowder had, so he experimented with very small lead balls — often 6mm (.243 caliber) in diameter. His guns were to be used on indoor shooting galleries and even in homes, so they acquired the generic titles gallery guns and parlor guns. As he developed the guns and cartridges, he eventually put a rim on his cartridges so they could be loaded into firearm breeches and extracted after they were fired. The priming compound was in the rim of the cartridge, which was called a rimfire cartridge.
In 1857, the Smith & Wesson company created a .22-caliber rimfire cartridge that had 4 grains of gunpowder (black powder) in the case with the priming compound. It gave a boost to the projectile’s velocity, so this cartridge was able to shoot a 29-grain conical lead bullet. It was called the .22 rimfire cartridge until 1871, when the introduction of the .22 long cartridge forced manufacturers to add the adjective “short” to its name. The .22 short is considered by many to be the first modern self-contained cartridge.
Airguns are being developed, too
At this same time (1840-1880), smallbore airguns were also being produced. They mostly shot darts; but as time passed, they began to shoot a small conical projectile that had a lead nose and a felt tail — the so-called “felted” slug. Other small projectiles (cat slugs, burred slugs) were also made at this time, but darts and round balls continued to be the most popular airgun ammunition through the end of the 19th century.
In Germany and Switzerland, shooters were taking the parlor guns with their percussion caps and balls in a completely different direction. I’m referring to the zimmerstutzen rifle. These were the 10-meter rifles of the 19th century, capable of accuracy that wasn’t surpassed until the advent of the FWB 150/300 in the 1960s. One curious thing that happened with these zimmerstutzen rifles was the size of the ball was reduced from 6mm and .22 caliber to 4.5mm for increased velocity. Actually, zimmerstutzen rifles came in a rainbow of different calibers, but the most popular ranged from 4.3mm to 4.5mm. Interesting — no?
Click here to read an article I wrote about zimmerstutzens