by B.B. Pelletier

Part 1
Part 2

Today I test the Daisy Powerline 953 TargetPro for accuracy and right off the bat I have to disqualify the sights that come with the gun. They are fiberoptic, which cannot be precise under any circumstances, and this set seems extremely difficult to use. For hitting Coke cans they are fine and for clipping clothes pins they’ll work okay, but for precision shooting you can forget them. All I had to do was fire four shots to know I couldn’t use them.

Allow me to explain. For precision shooting you have to see the front sight in relation to both the rear notch and the target. A fiberoptic front bead looks as large as a beachball when trying to aim a rifle. Yes, you can get on target quickly and if hitting within one inch at 10 yards is all you want this is the way to do it. But when you don’t want to be off by more than a few hundredths of an inch forget fiberoptics, ’cause they aren’t that precise.

So I jumped ahead and mounted a 4-power scope. I will return and test the rifle with target sights in the future, but today I wasn’t ready to do that. The scope I used is a short one that left the loading port open for loading, which quickly became a chore with several types of pellets. More on that as we review the pellets.

The course
The 953 is a plinking rifle that some people use as an informal target rifle. So I shot off a rest at 10 meters. I decided to shoot 20-shot groups just because they worked so well with the U.S. Avenger 1100. Remember, this is not a test of target shooting. All we are looking at is group size from pellet to pellet. I kept the same aim point and just adjusted the scope knobs for each pellet.

RWS Club 10
The first pellet I tried was the RWS Club 10. It’s a utility pellet that 953 owners might select for plinking, so the results should prove interesting. The Club 10 was the hardest pellet to load of all four pellets tested. It tended to flip backwards on the loading ramp and didn’t always line up with the breech.


RWS Club 10 pellets were just average in the 953 at 10 meters. Twenty shots from a rest.

Beeman H&N Match
The next pellet I tried was the Beeman H&N Match. I expected to be blown away, but I wasn’t. The results were clearly better than the Club 10s, but nothing spectacular. These pellets also had some difficulty loading and tended to flip backwards in the loading port.


This group is better than it looks because the long rip on the right side is not a pellet hole. The pellet that did that passed through the target at 7 O-Clock, at the edge of the scoring rings.

Gamo Match
I expected Gamo Match pellets to group larger than H&N Match, but they didn’t. Apparently this 953 likes them! They also had the same loading problems as the first two.


This group of Gamo Match pellets looks good because it happens to be in the black, but that’s just a coincidence. It is almost as good as the H&N Match, however.

Getting tired?
By this point in the test I had fired 60 shots and was getting tired as many of you predicted. I therefore saved the pellet many feel to be the best in this rifle for last. No one can say I gave them special consideration.

RWS R-10 Match pellets
RWS R-10 Match pellets loaded without any problems. They are very smooth on the outside and didn’t seem to catch anything like the other pellets did. Please ignore the fact that they landed smack in the center of the black. That was just a coincidence, as all the pellets were fired after the scope was adjusted from a central aim point.


I guess everyone is right about RWS R-10 Match pellets being the best in the 953. There may be only one or two pellets in the small hole, making the larger one the result of either 18 or 19 shots. That’s pretty amazing performance for a general-purpose air rifle that sells for less than $75!