by Tom Gaylord
Writing as B.B. Pelletier
Walther’s LGU underlever is a beautiful new spring rifle.
This report covers:
• Velocity with Crosman Premier lite pellets
• H&N Baracuda Match pellets
• Air Arms Falcon pellets
• Firing behavior
• Cocking effort
• Trigger-pull
Okay, sports fans, today we’ll test the new .177-caliber Walther LGU underlever rifle for velocity. And there are a couple other things we’ll look at.
Velocity with Crosman Premier lite pellets
Getting right to the task, I first shot the rifle twice to warm up the action. Then, I loaded a 7.9-grain Crosman Premier lite pellet and started the clock. The velocity started out in the 870-880 region, but on shot 7 it dropped to 842 f.p.s. The high for this string was 888, and the low was 842 f.p.s. That’s a spread of 46 f.p.s. that I think is due to the newness of the rifle. After it gets broken in I think it will settle down to a spread in the 20s or less.
The average with Premier lites was 872 f.p.s. That means this pellet developed an average muzzle energy of 13.34 foot pounds.
H&N Baracuda Match pellets
H&N Baracuda Match pellets went almost 100 f.p.s. slower, averaging 777 f.p.s from the LGU. You would expect that, given the pellet’s greater weight.
The spread ranged from a low of 770 to a high of 786 f.p.s., so right there the first pellet’s spread was cut by more than half! At the average velocity Baracuda Match pellets produced 14.28 foot-pounds of energy. That’s surprising, because usually a springer is less powerful with heavier pellets. It alerts me to the fact that this rifle might have some differences. The head size of these pellets is 4.50mm.
Air Arms Falcon pellets
The final pellet I tested in the LGU was the Falcon from Air Arms. Because this domed pellets weighs 7.33 grains, I expected it to be faster than the Premier lite that weighs 7.9 grains and the Baracuda Match that weighs 10.65 grains. While they were faster than the Baracudas, they were the same velocity as the Premiers. I also noticed they loaded very easily, which means they are a little small for the LGU’s breech.
Falcons went an average 872 f.p.s. with a spread from 864 to 882 f.p.s. Even though the average was the same as for the Premiers, the spread with Falcons was just 18 f.p.s., compared to 46 f.p.s. for the Premiers. That shows the gun is already starting to settle down. At the average velocity, Falcons produced 12.38 foot-pounds of energy at the muzzle.
Given that Baracudas were the most powerful in the LGU and these Falcons were no faster than the heavier Premiers, I will have to watch this rifle during the next set of tests. The powerplant is not behaving as I expected.
Firing behavior
This test was the first time I really had a chance to feel how the LGU feels when fired. I can feel a small buzz on every shot; and with the Baracudas, the buzz is a little more prominent. It’s one of those things that isn’t objectionable, but it’s there.
Cocking effort
The LGU cocks smoothly without any hesitation in the lever’s movement. But on the scale I did see one place in the lever’s arc where the effort spiked up one pound. On average, the effort is 37 lbs., except for that one spot where it spiked to 38 lbs. I get the feeling the effort will decrease by a couple pounds after break-in.
Trigger-pull
As the rifle came from the box, the 2-stage trigger was set to release at 1 lb., 15.5 oz. (31.5 oz). I liked the length of the first stage, which is long; but knowing that this is an adjustable trigger, I got out the tools and made some adjustments.
As it turned out, the trigger came set to the lightest pull. After I attempted (unsuccessfully) to adjust it lighter, the pull measured 2 lbs., 1 oz. The first-stage travel was also set to the lowest limit. I did adjust it longer, which worked as the instructions said.
I think you’re going to like the trigger right out of the box. There’s just a slight hint of creep in stage 2, but it’s very slight. It might go away after break-in; but if it doesn’t, perhaps a lubrication would do the trick.
Evaluation so far
I still like the LGU at this point. It feels very TX-like, and the velocity is about were it should be. I’m really looking forward to mounting a scope and seeing what this rifle can do at 25 yards. That’s next.
I’m really liking this new LGV. Usually spring guns with exceptional good piston seal will get better foot pound energy with heavy pellets. It makes a distinguished sound in firring cycle kinda like the TX200.
You mean LGU.
Gunfun.
B.B.’s LGU is looking good so far, if it shoots as good as yours I just might have to put it on my wish list. But for now I have the new HW50S to keep me entertained. Just my luck the forcast is calling for rain. Did you get the extra inserts for the front sight with your gun they are missing or hiding on my gun? Had to put a few rounds through it just for giggles, like it was already dark and raining when I got it home. Cocks with no strange sounds lighter then I thought it would. Love the trigger. I mounted the RWS 3-9×44 AO Night Pro scope that came with my 460 Magnum on it looks good.
David
David they are in the little white square package that was attached to the trigger guard by string.
Gunfun,
Found them, thanks
David
I did the same thing when I got my HW50s. I guess its the excitement of getting a new gun. 🙂
BB
It sounds like you described the .22 cal. model I got to a T. Well except my velocities were lower of course.
And I kind of hate to say this out loud. But the LGU I got it is giving the TX arun for its money. I even put the Vortek 12 fpe Pro Guide spring and tune kit in it.
I like that seal that they have on the breech that slides open on the LGU and I like the o-ring that they put on the outside diameter of the barrel where you load the pellet. It will be easy to change if needed. I think that gives the LGU a nice feel when you cock it. And it may just seal better.
I even like the grain in the LGU better than my other premium springers I have.
And I know your not shooting yet but my LGU is a shooter. Its got pick the nose up bump to it when you shoot it but you can’t hold it wrong. It hits on the money no matter how I hold it.
I think you know what I think about the LGU verses the other springers I got. But I’m just not going to say it.
GF1,
I thought about a Vortek kit for this rifle. Wouldn’t that be nice?
B.B.
You’ve gone and done it now. GF1 is probably ordering a Vortek for is LGU right now.
RR
Ha ha I already looked. Nope they don’t make a specific kit for the LGU but maybe one of the kits for another gun they show will fit.
But seriously the LGU does Not need a Vortek tune kit. I usually have my .177 Marauder sitting by the back door incase some of them pesky starlings show up. I know that gun hits no matter what. Well now this .22 cal. is sitting there right beside it. It hits no matter what also.
BB
I don’t know how your .177 feels when you shoot it but my .22 cal. model is smoooooth. No spring noise, no vibration, no clinking metal sounds, nothing. Just a very slight thump noise.
And the report is very quiet. I think I can say that it falls right in between the .177 cal. and .25 cal. Marauders I have. It is the quietest spring gun I have now.
Gunfun
I think you may just have two quiet 22 spring guns I a couple days as the titan you are getting is right about where you say your LGU is in the noise and firing cycle category.
I think you will be very happy with it and I want to know what you think of it when you get it shoot some.
BD
Buldawg
I can’t wait to see what that bearing mod for the trigger feels like.
I sure have had a bunch of them kind of guns with them triggers so if it feels like I’m thinking I will be happy. And I do like a lite trigger.
Gunfun
I think you will like it the way it is with the bearing, the first stage may be a little short for you as I know you like a long first stage but the release is very smooth and crisp with no creep or gritty fell at all.
It has about a 1/8 inch first stage then a very crisp release with very little effort from the first stage to the second and release.
BD
Buldawg
I hope that Benjamin buddy bottle works out for you. And I hope you get it in time for the field targer match Saturday your going to shoot.
Gunfun
The FedEx tracking is showing it to be here Friday so I will just have to fill it up and it will be ready as I assume you ship it unfilled.
It is showing rain from late Friday night till Saturday afternoon so I don’t know if the match will be called off or held on Sunday. I am going to email Paul to find out what the plan is tomorrow.
BD
Buldawg
Were suppose to get freezing rain starting tomorrow then changinging over to just rain.
You will probably get the rain Saturday I bet. If I’m remembering right I think you said you are a few days behind what we get here.
Bummer I want to know what you get with your new setup.
Gunfun
It is showing rain starting Friday night and lasting thru Saturday afternoon, but got email from club pres. and he said meet at 900 am for matches so I will email him Friday night if it is raining and see what the plan is.
I am wanting to shoot my Mrod in the matches real bad.
BD
Sounds like a real beauty so far, BB!
Have you told Edith about your new girl yet? :O
She might be purty, but I don’t think it sounds like the LGU will be a Safe Queen.
About the buzz you’re feeling, what does it indicate? Is it stronger now than when you started?
Also, how many pellets have gone down the barrel at this point? It’s not exact, but it is a good indicator of break-in if you have a hundred or two cycled through. Many take more, some take a LOT more, but it is always nice to have a guesstimate.
Thanks for your patience with those of us who might not get everything you’re mentioning; I really appreciate everything covered in the comments at LEAST as much as the info covered in the write-up!
Ojay,
I hated reporting the buzz, after all the fuss about the FWB Sport, but it is there. It is very small and no, it is not growing.
I’ve probably shot this rifle 50 times so far.
B.B.
Tom,
I read somewhere that the powerplant of the LGU is the same as the LGV. Is that correct? My LGV has quite a bit of buzz/twang.
Michael
Michael,
I can’t say how similar the two powerplants are, but my LGV is dead calm. That’s why I like it so much!
B.B.
B.B.
If I remember your personal LGV is a .22cal. I’m guessing the .177cal you tested was a loaner probably long returned to Pyramyd. It may be that both the LGU and LGV shoot just a little better in .22cal. Will you also try out the LGU in .22cal since you tested the LGV in both calibers? If I get either the LGU or TX I’m going to be looking hard at a .22cal.
David
David,
I may test an LGU in .22 at some point, but right now I am so backed up with ongoing tests and new things that haven’t got started that it will be months away, if at all.
B.B.
B.B.
That’s just fine since between the 460 Magnum and the HW50S it’s going to be awhile before I can afford either rifle. And it will be nice to see you wrap up some of the accuracy testing you started.
David
BB
That reminds me. I was going to ask if your TX did this.
For a bout a hundred shots or so when I pushed the safety off It sounded like there is a spring behind it or something. It would make a slight buzz that lasted about a second. It would make that same noise when the gun fired. Now after the hundred shots it doesn’t do it. And the safety always functioned smooth and still does. But I wanted to know if anybody else heard that in their guns.
And there was no noise from the factory power plant or the Vortek kit it was just the safety making the buzz at first.
GF1,
There is a spring in the safety, but it’s the size of a ballpoint pen spring and it doesn’t make any noise. I have not heard what you are talking about.]
B.B.
BB
My TX sure did it. I was thinking it was going to be one of them signature noises that some guns have. But it went away. Who knows. Thanks though.
Qjay,
The LGU is on loan from Pyramyd AIR. I have not been told that we’re buying it. I could be the type of wife who says, “You already own a TX200, so what’s the sense in owning an LGU?” But I already know there will be a laundry list of comebacks for saying something so absurd 🙂
Edith
Edith,
I am glad the cat is finally out of the bag. The “Loan” thing is something I’ll have to try telling my wife! I hope it works as well for me! 😉
Out of curiosity, how often do you try out the airguns BB gets to test? I haven’t seen many places where you weigh in on a particular airgun being reviewed, but I notice you always get a good response to any comments you add about a gun.
It seems a bit like you prefer powder burners unless you are involved in pest removal around the house.
Qjay,
You’re right — I don’t shoot a lot. We’ve talked about having me accompany Tom to the range 1x a month, but that never happened. Maybe some day.
Edith
Edith and fellow bloggers,
when my wife says I already own too many air rifles and why do I need another one, I respond, “for the same reasons you have so much jewelry and are always on the look out for more”. She hasn’t come back to me with a response 🙂
Tee Hee!
Fred DPRoNJ
Fred,
You’re barking up the wrong tree 🙂
Jewelry, clothing and shoes are of no interest to me. In fact, Tom almost has to force me to buy something for myself. I detest shopping. I want for nothing and rarely ask for anything.
Besides, I don’t complain if he wants another gun. He’s got it pretty darned good — and he knows it!
Edith
Edith and Tom,
My confession wasn’t necessarily directed to you, Edith. More to those poor slobs, like me, who when we want to purchase something we have to “justify” it to the “better half”. We all know you are a rare gem and BB should thank his lucky stars every day!
Fred DPRoNJ
Fred,
He does!
B.B.
Fred,
Okay. I thought it was aimed at me since you replied to my comment.
But I should thank you. Apparently, Tom’s pretty much skating thru life when it comes to gun acquisitions. Maybe I need to tighten things up a bit. I’m sure he’ll thank you for bringing this up 🙂
Edith
Fred,
I wish I could do the same, but Edith doesn’t like jewelry, clothes, shoes or anything else that is conventional. In fact, only recently has she shown an interest in anything!
She likes cooking (always has) and wanted a few utensils and implements for the kitchen. For the first time in 33 years there are finally some things she wants, so guess what I’m doing?
B.B.
Edith
BB has to get this gun if he likes it.
I’m soooo, soooo glad that I have both my TX and the LGU. They are both sweet guns.
And I’m going to dare to say it out loud right now. I believe I like the .22 cal. LGU better than the TX right now. And you know that’s a scary statement to make since we all know how nice the TX’s are.
Mark,
If you happen to get the new Webley MVI revolver you will definitely be holding a nose heavy revolver. I love mine by the way. I think it handles very well.
GF1,
I have gone on record previously stating that I believe my LGV to be a better rifle than my TX200. Keep in mind though that all of my springers are still being shot as they came out of the box. No tunes on any of them.
G&G
My TX was still factory stock when I got the LGU and they were comparable to each other as for as how the guns grouped but both guns have a different shot cycle.
The TX with the lower powered Vortek kit definatly smoothed it out more than it was from the factory.
The fit and finnish is good on both guns but the sliding breech on the LGU I think is better than the TX. The TX is good but you feel nothing when you close the cocking arm on the TX. The LGU has drag feel to it kind of like a precise piston and seal to a cylinder.
But the LGU wood has way more character to its grain than the TX. And on the other hand the TX stock is like the stock was a custom made fit just for me. It just falls into place when I hold it.
So I say both excellent guns just one verses the other have their own distinct plus’s. And really no minuses that I see.
My God, I never heard anything like that from a woman. The very idea that a woman could admit a possible laundry list of comebacks boggles me.
Is it possible you could get rid of the pesky Tom person and come marry me? 🙂
heh heh…I knew that was coming !
B.B.,
I would really like to see you try out JSB 8.44 grain pellets in your accuracy trials. At least, that is the best pellet in my LGV. Thanks (especially if you try the JSB’s).
G&G
G&G,
You have a .177? Okay, I will try 8.44.
B.B.
B.B.,
Thank you very much. Yes, my LGV is .177cal. Beyond that the JSB 8.44s also are the best pellet in my R9 and TX200 not to mention several PCPs.
By the way, are you finished with the FWB Sporter or are you going to look for a better pellet? Again, I would suggest the JSB 8.44s. I hate to sound like a broken record but I and others I know have had such good success with this pellet. Thanks.
G&G
G&G,
I am going to try 50 yards one more time. I will shoot the 8.4s
B.B.
Yes the JB exact pellet you are talking about is the best in my LGU. at 28 yds one ragged hole. I will take it further if it warms up a little
I bought a tin of Falcons in .22 for my HW35 originally as i was told they should be very accurate and though they are,they’re just not as accurate as AA Diabolo’s or H&N Fields. And that ‘s the case in all my sub 12 ft/lb .22, springer’s and PCP’s alike. The other thing is that just as the .177’s in tour test is that they have always come out with less muzzle velocity than other pellets i have used, which is to be expected in my AAs410 but i wouldn’t have thought so in my various springer’s and up to 2 ft/lb less in some cases. The one thing i will say is they do produce the smallest spread in FPS in everything i have used them in, and i have yet to find a damaged skirt to date.
Have a spiffing day everyone.
TTFN
Best wishes, Wing Commander Sir Nigel Tetlington-Smythe
Sir Nigel,
I believe it was I who suggested the Falcons. Although I made no guarantees I am sorry they did not work out for you. They are tops in my HW35E and several other airguns. Maybe you will find something they work best in down the road.
Mark N
I wonder what the difference is. Has anyone mic’d the skirts to see if they are thicker? Checked the alloy/hardness? As I recall, someone (BB?) said they had a slightly lower head diameter, and if they are thicker, harder, and smaller, they might take a longer amount of time for the skirts to engage the rifling, which would allow greater pressure loss, leading to that difference in speed noted above and in the article.
This would be most noticeable in a springer, due to the “all at once” nature of the beast, as opposed to a pumper or a PCP, I would think.
Then again, what do I know, I just want to try them. 😉
LOL – There is a coarse inverse relationship between pellet weight and muzzle velocity. Other than that the only way to determine how a particular pellet will perform in a particular rifle is to test fire some of the pellets.
There have been models for supersonic bullets in firearms where the shape of the nose and tail, length, and so on, can predict a reasonable BC. Not so for subsonic pellets so far.
That inverse relationship was why I asked about it. 😉
The pellets referenced are /product/air-arms-falcon-177-cal-4-52mm-7-33-grains-domed-500ct?p=714 and BB described them this way:
“Because this domed pellets weighs 7.33 grains, I expected it to be faster than the Premier lite that weighs 7.9 grains and the Baracuda Match that weighs 10.65 grains. While they were faster than the Baracudas, they were the same velocity as the Premiers. I also noticed they loaded very easily, which means they are a little small for the LGU’s breech…[snip]…these Falcons were no faster than the heavier Premiers…”
The part that is confusing is why these are sometimes slower than similar weight or even heavier pellets, and why they might have accuracy issues. The reason I wonder if it is the head size or lack of engagement for the rifling is because if that is the case, then the airguns the pellet is most accurate in might actually be a few thousandths narrower in the leade, but I also wonder if the skirts might just engage slower, thereby “wasting” air, since a springer doesn’t keep pushing as it travels down the barrel.
Testing is definitely important, because it determines WHAT happens, but it does not often determine WHY it happens, and I am one of those darn kids that always asks why. 😉
Thanks! ~Qjay!
Qjay
The waist diameter of the pellet makes a difference in how much drag the pellet has. Some pellets that both weigh the same will hold their velocity for a longer distance when the other one may start falling of on velocity sooner.
And there are many other design features that affect a pellets flight characteristics.
Pellets are tricky little creatures. Once you think you got them figured out they will turn on you on a dime.
Qjay, Gunfun1
I think both of you are right : the shape and thickness of a pellet skirt determines how much fps at muzzle : while shape of pellet and weight determines how far it maintains its velocity.
Yes Mark, i believe it was and i thank you for suggesting them. While i didn’t get quite the same success you found with them, i still enjoyed testing them and as i said they are still an accurate pellet. In fact while out in the woods i once used up all my AA Diabollo’s in my AAs410 and just swapped over to Falcon’s, I didn’t even have to re sight the scope to get the same POI and that’s with a 2.5 gr difference between the pelllets. I still have some left and have not given up on them as they will get there chance along side all the usual suspects when i test the next air rifle i refurb, the one after that, and the one after that. Atb
Sir Nigel
B.B.,
I notice that once in awhile you’ll do an article about your favorite airguns or your top 10 airguns and why. I have not seem such article in a long while. As Xmas approaches some of us are figuring out which airgun we want or which one is the best value for the money.
Joe,
That’s a good idea. Let me give it some thought.
B.B.
BB,
You could just talk a little about each of your present collection and why it is there and probably do at least a two part series.
RR,
That sounds like a good format. Thanks.
B.B.
B.B.,
I suggest you go out on a limb and include rifles that you don’t own but by proven track record and what you know from friends and colleagues know these guns to be first class shooters and should be in anyone’s top ten list. Regardless of price, be they $100 or $2500 rifles. Maybe that could be a separate list from the guns you own.
G&G
So this day, the speed of lite is 888fps (ok bad joke). I really like underlever rifles but my split left bicep gives me grief with nose heavy air rifles. Both the TX200 and China 46U just don’t work well for me, but the Diana 48 weight is back far enough where I can hold on target. How is the balance on this one?
Mark,
I just picked it up. It’s nose-heavy.
B.B.
Trying to hold a rifle on target has become so difficult for me that I realized yesterday after trying a few offhand shots with the Regal if I’m gonna be competitive i’s gonna have to be with a pistol or benchrest.
Felt like saying goodbye to part of myself.
Pffft. Do snipers shoot off hand? Shooting a rifle off hand is over rated, as far as I’m concerned. Even hunters will look for something to rest against when that big “eyed” buck walks into a clearing. I wouldn’t beat myself up if I were you, Reb.
Fred DPRoNJ
Fred,
The reason I am taking up field target again is because we get to sit on stools and use sticks to support the rifle!
B.B.
B.B.
Stool I got where do I get the sticks? Pyramyd doesn’t seem to carry them.
David
David,
I will soon be testing a perfect monopod support that PA now carries.
/product/utg-monopod-v-rest-camera-adapter-20-50-to-58-75?a=5429
B.B.
Since a bipod is allowed for field target, I think you’d be handicapping yourself to use a monopod. The bipod doesn’t sway side to side.
John,
Tom shoots a TX200, so a bipod wouldn’t work.
Edith
Edith
Sorry but why won’t a bi-pod work with a TX . I use a bi-pod with mine.
Don’t get mad at me I just don’t understand what you mean.
GF1,
Edith was confused. You guys call shooting sticks bipods because they have 2 legs. She thought you were talking about a real bipod that attaches to the underlever of the rifle. Of course even one of those can be made to work, but not very well.
B.B.
GF1,
I thought it would get in the way of the underlever.
Edith
Edith and BB
There was no room to reply below your responses so I posted here.
Yes that’s the thing about all this accessories stuff for guns. I bet if we search it there is all kind of shooting props that are made.
I have seen them made out of 3 sticks and tied together towards the top and then rest your gun while your standing. They are suppose to be very stable actually.
When I was a kid squerrial hunting out in the woods I would rest the gun in the Y of the branch on a tree. Heck sometimes I would grab hold of a tree with my hand and lay the stock of the gun on wrist. That’s actually a very stable artillery style hold.
And yes I sure wouldn’t rest the barrel or any other part of spring guns cocking mechanism on a support of whatever type that may be used.
John,
A monopod doesn’t have to sway. I will show how it works when I review it. It’s faster and I think better than many of the bipods now on the market.
B.B.
Looking forward to it – I’ll hold off on buying a pair of shooting sticks until then. The primos Pole Cat looks pretty stable – no wobbly ball joint or monopod top (like the trigger stick bipod so many field target shooters use).
B.B.
I have a nice monopod, maybe not as nice as the new UTG, gonna give it a try with the Remington Airgun Targets I just received from Pyramyd today. I have the crow and rabbit string reset version. Not sure if I should chance using them with the 460 Magnum it does shoot under 1000 fps with the 10.34gr JSB pellets but were these targets designed to handle a 20 fpe gun?
David
David,
Sorry to say, no. I used those targets at the Pyramyd AIR cup and saw how lightly they are constructed. We had to emplace them at 30 yards and more and even then they got pretty beat-up.
B.B.
B.B.
Thanks for the info, I’ll stick the HW50S a see how target holds up. If I tare it up with that rifle I’ll just return the unused one to Pyramyd.
Looking forward to the report on the UTG monopod.
David
You are right. shooting off hand is nerve wracking and a waste of ammo. A shotgun is to be shot offhand
Whats up Reb.
You got to get you one of them bi-pods with extendable legs that you can adjust. I use mine when I stand or when I sit on the ground.
Once you get one you will love it. I found that sitting on the ground with the bi-pod is best. That way the legs are short and more rigid. Also your closer to the ground and more level with your target if its a ground shot. That way your hold is more true and you don’t have to worry about that angle/degree thing being factored in.
What I’m trying to say is a bi-pod helps verses unsupported shooting.
Gunfun
I am with you on the bipod as I have a monopod at I can not keep it from swaying as you put it so for me any way two legs are better than one.
I also see no reason it will not work on most any air rifle as long as there is some part of the stock that is below the cocking linkage it will work.
BD
Buldawg
I have used my bi-pod on all my air guns I have now with no problems. Standing and sitting. And by far sitting is the most stable.
And my bi-pod is similar to yours. It has the adjustable legs but where you rest the gun in the yoke mine swivels 360 degrees. And that spot is a fixed v shape with rubber pads in it.
I’m thinking that the mono-pod that BB has a flat base that will take different attachments. That’s why it may not work on some guns. I don’t know that for a fact. That’s just a guess about the mono-pod.
Gunfun
IT may have a flat base or something like that. The monopod I have I put a 2 inch round flat piece of aluminum from a crash bumper that they use on sport bikes to help protect the bodywork in a wreck on the end of mine as it was just a point to give it a little more support on top of the ground and not let it dig in when you rest the gun on it but it still swayed and it could also be me shaking.
But I do better with a bipod and the one you saw on my gun caddy was another gift from Loren that he did not use any more and let me have it. I will eventually get one like yours that is u shaped and swivels.
I would have replied sooner but just got off the phone with Reb and he is in Abilene right now at his Nephews having some testing done at the hospital there. I will text you in a minute and tell you more.
BD
Reb,
Due to several ailments I have I can’t shoot off-hand with much accuracy if I don’t have a monopod, bipods better but not allowed. As we age we simply lose certain abilities. Certainly nothing to be ashamed of. Most of my shooting now is from a rest (except pistols and light rifles (such as the HW30S). Certainly don’t have remorse. I have come to love benchrest.
G&G
G&G
I totally like bench rest and bi-pod shooting.
And I do shoot my liter guns without resting. Some situations the Marauders don’t get rested any kind of way.
But I will have to say that the HW50s is that go to gun it is lite and just feels small when I hold it.
Just read your 2010 post Re: S&W 78G. Want to have mine repaired and was wondering who Dave in Oregon was and if I could send my 78 to him for repair? Truly miss plinking with this piece as it is good for practice and doesn’t require ear protection just to have some fun shooting cans.
pmgardner
Paul,
Welcome to the blog.
I don’t know Dave in Oregon. Maybe one of our readers knows him?
If not him, then I can recommend this guy:
B.B.
It’s Dave Gunter in Oregon. I’m unable to find any working pages on the internet that include his contact info. Here’s the last phone number I have for him (1990s): 503-556-1439.
Edith
Where is part 2? All I see is a reprint of part 1.
Thanks,
Mike
Mike,
THIS is Part 2! The link takes you back to Part 1.
Part 3 hasn’t been written yet.
B.B.
Walther appears to be making somewhat of a blitz in the spring rifle market. If true, is it because spring guns are more popular than the other powerplants? I would guess so with their ease of maintenance. This one is kind of weird-looking, but I expect the usual Walther quality is there.
Mike, thanks for your comments about the CZ 75 SP-01. The MSRP I found is about $680. While a goodly amount, that is considerably less than what I paid for my SW 1911. Still, I imagine whatever superiority it has is probably not too significant below the elite competitive level. Parts availability would be a bigger concern. And in that respect you can hardly do better than the Glocks or the Beretta.
Let’s acknowledge the fine customer service of Leapers as I return my damaged and cloudy UTG scope for a brand new replacement based on their lifetime warranty. This will rejuvenate my B30 which has been languishing.
Matt61
Gunfun,
Just a quickle report on the HW50S. Yes the stock screws loosened and also the front sight after about 90 rounds shot. Tightened things up and proceded to shoot a .403″ center to center 10 shot group at 23yds with JSB Match Exact Diabolo 8.44 gr pellets. Falcons shot a .603″ center to center but that was before I tighteded the loose screws. Think I’ll quit while I’m ahead the .403″ group was on the last group shots 91 to 100 through the gun. I’ll do some chrony testing later after I warm up and bring in the dog. She is outside having a good bark at someone or something.
David
David
Sounds like your getting somewhere. Do you have any of the JSB 10.34 grn pellets. For some reason they shoot faster than other brand pellets of the same weight. Just thought I would mention that.
And if you shoot a few more hundred through it you will probably have to tighten one more time. Mine seated in pretty good have had to tighten them anymore yet. And did you check to see if the break barrel hinge point needed tightening. If it swings back up free after you cock it and load the pellet it needs tightened. It should stay in place with it cocked and broke open. After I tightened that mine came in real good on accuracy.
Let me known how it goes.
Gunfun,
I do have a tin of the JSB 10.34gr pellets shot them between the Falcons and the 8.44 JSB pellets and got 4 flyers. I think the loose front sight and stock screws may have something to do with the flyers. The other six grouped well but I didn’t bother to measure because of the flyers. I know my 460 Magnum sure likes those 10.34 JSBs.
David
Gunfun,
The hinge was tight out of the box and the barrel stays put at any angle. The .403″ group is excelent for me.
David
David
That’s with open sites I guess. I can’t rember if you had a scope on it. Are you resting the gun when you shoot. Just wondering I don’t think you said.
And I do believe that your groups will get tighter as you get more time on the gun. I think you will be surprised.
And yes now I remember you said you shot the 10.34 JSB’s in your 460. I have shot those pellets in slow guns and fast guns with good results. I notice sometimes when I’m shooting a new springer that them flyer type shots usually sound louder and I can smell the detonation. I think that might be happening to you still. Especially since you said the hinge point was tight.
So I myself think you will be getting some better groups and you will be surprised. I keep saying that don’t I. 🙂
David I did see above you put a scope on it.
But yes still curious to know what happens after you get more time on it.
Gunfun,
I think this gun is going to be a real winner once I put a few hundred more rounds though it. It is already shooting as well as the 460 Magnum and that has over 1000 rounds through it. And unlike the 460 Magnum it doesn’t seem very hold sensitive.
David
David
I believe you just explained the difference between the heavy hitting magnums and the milder slower shooting sport gun.
Hold sensitivity.
Gunfun,
True but the 460 Magnim shoots way smoother then I was lead to believe. Plus proper hold and follow through is a good habit so I’m still going to pretent the HW50S is hold sensitive so I don’t get sloppy.
David
David
I think you got the right formula for air gun success there.
🙂
Gunfun,
Just trying to practice what “The Godfather” preaches. LOL
David
And that’s that. 🙂
Gunfun1
I had to loosen the barrel pivot bolt some on my new HW50 It was way to tight .
Chris
What made you think it was too tight? The cocking effort?
The reason I tightened mine was because my groups getting more and more horizontal. Instesd of a nice found group I started getting clover leaf groups then they started turning into the horizontal line.
I tightened the hinge point screws like I explained above and the groups turned back into the round group with a few shots that tryed to make it clover leafed. But the majority of the groups are nice and round.
My phone!
Suppose to say.
Instead of a nice round group I started getting clover leaf groups…
GF1
There are some things to watch.
How hard the barrel is to swing involves more than just the hinge joint. You could have an extremely tight linkage joint too, or a binding cocking shoe if the rifle has one. Possibility of some or all of the above. You can get fooled if you are not careful.
twotalon
TT
That is good points you make also about tight cocking.
My HW50s was very easy to cock when I got it. I never measured it but it seriously only felt like about 20 pounds. The barrel was adjusted right at the point of it trying to stay in position after cocking but it would try to fall open when it wasn’t latched. And after I shot it a while instead of the groups trying to get better as it broke in they were trying to get worse. So that’s when I tightened the pivot screw’s.
I think that is something that is overlooked when breaking in a break barrel spring gun.
Its amazing how much difference it makes with the guns accuracy if you stay on top of the screw tightness on the stock and action.
Have you ever had to resight a gun after you took the action out of the stock and put it back in. I have.
GF1
I don’t remember if I had to sight in again or not. Probably did, because screw tightness can cause POI change and group size changes.
Found with HW that the hinge needs to be adjusted more often when new. Gradually starts to hold a more steady tension longer as you shoot it more. Becomes pretty stable after a while.
twotalon
TT
That’s exactly how the HW50s acted at first. Its settled into be a real nice shooter.
That is why they make fixed barrels lol
Gunfun1
Yes the cocking was hard. but I didn’t mind that… what was killing me was closing the barrel it took me 3 to 4 times to latch it close… you know you thought you were using enough force to lock it and it bounced back off the latch detente and again and again I was like Jesus any harder and ill bend the barrel upwards. I should be able to push the barrel close with ease… but the barrel should be able to stay open at any given angle I push it to.. without falling down by itself..
Gunfun1
I did make sure the barrel didn’t wobble side to side . I loosened the barrel so it feel like all the rest of HW I own. And it did make the cocking less harder. I think I also will get the Vortek kit .
Chris
I detuned my TX with the 12 fpe Vortek.
All I can say is sweet. Its definitely a smooth talk’n gun when you shoot it now.
Chris,
That doesn’t sound at all like the gun I just received. Cocking force is definitely lower then my Ruger Air Hawk, breaks open easier and locks up easier. Don’t see any reason to detune my HW50S it’s a 12 fpe gun already and even with only 100 rounds through mine it is smooth with no buzz. If I want to nit pick the stock is somewhat of a disappointment compared to the beautiful stock on my 460 Magnum the checkering is not as etched and the grain is not as nice.
David
David
I got my HW50 from PA. I love my HW50 .177cal it cocks butter smooth nice shot cycle NO BUZZ NO VIBRATION But little hard recoil if anything. mine is shooting a little hot as they say Beeman Kodiaks 10.65 @ 830fps. so I could give up some fps for less recoil. I also have a 22cal HW50 tuned by Jan Kramer and that is so sweet the difference is like night and day.
Chris
Wow your .177 HW50s is shooting that fast with that 10.65 grn. pellet.
Mine is shooting the 10.34’s at a average of 725 now after being broke in. I always thought mine was quiet and smooth
shooting.
Is yours older or newer?
Gunfun1
New style. Got it from PA this year May . You own the LGU ..nice and TX200 nice pair.. I really want the LGV master or if PA get the Walter LG terrus?
Chris
I got mine after yours.
I wonder if the springs pressure tolerances vary when the springs are made.
Maybe that’s why different people have different acting guns when they are the same gun and caliber.
I was talking to Buldawg the other day and we noticed that both of our .177 cal. Marauders loaded the same JSB 10.34 pellet’s differently. One gun they fill tight when they load and one gun feels loose.
We both have the same time and we both shoot at the same fill pressure’s. And both guns are e equal in accuracy.
But the same pellet feels different loading.
Suppose to say we both have the same tune on our guns.
Chris,
OK that explains it. My gun out of the box is shooting right at 12 fpe (800 fps adv. with 8.44 gr JSB pellets) these are the only pellets shot over the chrony for now. Your’s is shooting more like an HW80. I can see wanting to dial your’s back some.
David
Chris
Now that I’m thinking about it at one point in time I noticed the latch was getting dry so I put some silicone grease on it.(it was latching easy but it was dry)
After I greased it became hard to latch. I cleaned the grease off and put some white lithium grease on it and cocked it and latched and unlatched it a few times and its been great ever since.
When I first got my LGU it had a buzz that was driving me mad to the point that I nearly took it back to the shop.
Its only when I changed the scope out of desperation that it stopped! it turns out it was the scope resonating, could yours be caused by this? Mine is in .177 as well but has a spread of <6fps, yours could still be dieseling.
James,
I haven’t mounted a scope yet.
B.B.
James my .22 cal. LGU dieseled very little. It was probably the quickest springer that I have to break in and get consistent fps spreads.
I wonder if things are different inside the .22 that I got verses the .177 models. My guns firing cycle is dead quiet and I do have a scope mounted with 2 piece rings.
fair enough. the buzz may decrease as it beds in. hope you enjoy it as much as i enjoy mine.
I’d guess the .22 has a softer mainspring due to being more efficient. mine has little recoil so the .22 must be amazing.
James
I’m not sure if its the spring or if the shot cycle is cushioned more with the .22 cal. version. I think it takes more pressure to build behind the pellet verses the smaller .177 cal. pellet. Just a thought. You would have to think that affects the shot cycle some way.
looks like PA discontinued the LGV line . I better get the LGV Master for $459 elsewhere asap.
Chris,
Where did you see that Pyramyd is discontinuing the LGV? And who has the LGV Master for $459?
David
David
I just click again to go to PA store and it does show it is under Walther products It is still there…. a few minutes ago I click on to the LGU picture from there I click on more Walther products then click to air rifles and the pistols and pcp and the LGU were only showing not the LGV’s . So I jumped the gun and made a fool of my self ”Sorry Everyone” . but I did ask PA if they price match because their online competitor list the LGV master @ $459, and they said no they do not match price nor they can give any discounts to that gun nor the AA TX 200 bummer. If you goggle the LGV Master $459 it will show who is selling for less.
Chris
Didn’t find the sight with that search, but it really doesn’t matter since I ain’t buying one now.
David
David
PA has the best deal on pellets not even AOA can beat them.
Yeah, got that.
Thanks
David
Chris In Ct,
I paid $649 for my Master Ultra LGV from PA about a year ago. Frankly, I suppose it’s possible but I would shocked if anyone is selling it for $459. I’ll have to look for myself.
G&G
G&G
Its the LGV Master not the LGV Master Ultra
B.B.,
Do you have any plans to test the Air Arms HFT 500? I am curious to see if it’s just a S500 as a carbine in a field target stock. And particularly if it shoots better than the S500. It would be nice to find a world beater at a more reasonable price.
G&G
G&G,
No plans at this time. While I like their springers, I never liked Air Arms PCPs very much, other than the Shamal.
B.B.
I am ridiculously excited about the LGU. I wish my 3 year old daughter would have asked Santa for that… Lol
Caleb,
Sometimes parents have to make decisions for their children who aren’t equipped to make them.
B.B.
Absolutely true. We will stick to the Disney frozen ice castles for now.
I wouldn’t worry about reporting on the minor buzz, it’s half the price of the FWB, most HW77/97’s buzz a bit too
It’s the sticker price of the FWB that causes the complaint
You spend 20k on a budget car you might not complain if the dash creaks, buy a Bentley and you’ll be taking it back to the shop to get it sorted