by Tom Gaylord
Writing as B.B. Pelletier
This report covers:
- The test
- H&N Finale Match Light
- RWS Meisterkugeln Rifle
- Qiang Yuan Olympic
- Discussion 1
- Sig Match Ballistic Alloy
- Discussion 2
- RWS R10
- Discussion 3
- H&N Finale Light again
- What now?
Today we start looking at the accuracy of my Beeman P17 pistol. Remember — there’s still a lot more to come in this series. We started by learning how to fix and reseal the pistol, thanks to reader 45Bravo, and now we are looking at the P17 in its own right.
I shot off a rest at 10 meters. The pistol was rested directly on the sandbag, as a single-stroke pneumatic has very little recoil. I shot every target in this test with open sights, which I will discuss at the end of the report. I shot just 5 shots at each 10-meter pistol target.
It took eight shots to sight in, where I’m normally on in two or three. I thought the pistol would be pretty close to on, but it wasn’t. And I discovered that the rear sight really moves the pellets around fast.
H&N Finale Match Light
First up were 5 Finale Match Light target pellets. They went into 0.712-inches at 10 meters. The group is a little to the right of the center, but I left the sights where they were because the pellets that follow will all shoot to different places.
Five H&N Finale Match Light pellets went into a 0.712-inch group at 10 meters.
Next up were Air Arms Falcon pellets. I knew some of you would want to see how a dome did, so this is for you. Five pellets went into 0.906-inches at 10 meters. I will have more to say about it at the end of this report.
The P17 put 5 Falcons in 0.916-inches at 10 meters.
RWS Meisterkugeln Rifle
The next pellet I tried was the RWS Meisterkugeln Rifle. This 8.2-grain wadcutter is a little heavy for the power of the P17 but I thought at least one reader wanted me to try it. Five pellets made a group that measures 1.142-inches between centers at 10 meters. It’s a little large but the pellet holes are nicely punched out.
Five RWS Meisterkugeln went into 1.142-inches at 10 meters.
Qiang Yuan Olympic
Next I shot 5 Qiang Yuan Olympic pellets. These sometimes shoot surprisingly well and other times not so well. This was an “other” time, with 5 pellets going into a 0.983-inch group at 10 meters.
Five Qiang Yuan Olympic pellets went into 0.983-inches at 10 meters.
At this point in the test I was starting to wonder if the larger groups were my fault and not that of the pellets. I found the P17’s sights hard to align for some reason. The rear notch seems a bit too wide and not deep enough. I will say more about this at the end of the test.
Sig Match Ballistic Alloy
The next pellet was my great hope for the P17. I figured Sig Match Ballistic Alloy pellets would drill a tight little hole and I might have to bring out the trime for photography. But when I went downrange I saw an open groups that didn’t look that good. It measures 1.035-inches between the centers of the two holes farthest apart. Bummer!
Five Sig Match Ballistic Alloy pellets made this 1.035-inch group at 10-meters.
Now I was more certain that I was right about what was happening. All the groups except the first one are close to the same size. It looks to me like I am the problem and not the gun or the pellets. Apparently I am either having an off day or the P17 sights are not working for me. Maybe the last pellet will tell?
The last pellet I tried was the RWS R10 Match Pistol pellet. I really expected it to give me the tight group that was missing from the test. But it didn’t. Instead, five pellets went into 0.966-inches at 10 meters — about the same as all the others!
Five RWS R10 Pistol pellets went into 0.966-inches at 10 meters.
Okay — it was time to test old BB! If I was the reason all these groups except the first one were so large, I would shoot a second group with the Finale Light pellets and it would look like the rest of the groups. If it was small like the first group, then BB was shooting well and the pellets were the problem. I did adjust the rear sight two clicks to the left for this one. The adjustment doesn’t really click, but there are marks on the sight that I’m calling clicks.
H&N Finale Light again
This second group of H&N Finale Match pellets made a 0.976-inch group. It’s a very round group, but also an open one.
The second five H&N Finale Match pellets went into 0.976-inches at 10 meters.
Either I had a bad day or these sights are fighting me. Either way I can solve it if I shoot the pistol with a dot sight, using the exact same pellets. The UTG Reflex Micro dot sight seems like the ideal sight to try, so next time that’s what I’ll do. I fully expect adding that sight will reduce the size of these groups by a significant amount — similar to what we saw with the Buck BB gun that was scoped. If that doesn’t happen, then old BB just had a bad day.
Even with today’s groups the Beeman P17 is still an accurate air pistol. I just know that it can be more accurate and I hope to show that to you next time.
Only when editing this report to publish did I realize that I failed to test the difference in accuracy between flush-seated pellets and deep-seated pellets. So I will add that to the test with the dot sight.
Then we have the Beeman P3 pistol to consider. I’ve always wanted to compare these two air pistols that look so alike. But how close are they really? We shall see.
21 thoughts on “Beeman P17 air pistol: Part 4”
Yes, the fiber optic sights can be tedious to use.
I really dislike them.
I hope it does better with the red dot…
This pistol doesn’t have fiberoptics. But the sights seem hinky nonetheless.
I never managed a good 10m group with my Beeman P17
and considered myself a poor pistol shot until I got my
Gamo PT85 with which I did much better even with its fixed sights.
You know glowy thingys are not meant for precision. I am certain they are fine on feral soda cans, but trime groups? Seriously.
This one doesn’t have fiberoptics. It’s an older one.
I guess this is a “better” version for such. As you said, let us see how the red dot does.
How come you didn’t test Crosman Premier Lites and RWS Hobbies?
Those were the pellets Mac got the best results with when testing the P3 back in 2010.
Well, this is a P17 made in China and not a P3 made in Germany. But there is another test coming, so I can also try those pellets.
Is no part of the P17 manufactured by Weihrauch, not even the barrel?
No. It’s all made in China. Weihrauch had nothing to do with this airgun until they were forced to fix them because people thought they were having them made. I’ll be talking to Hans Weihrauch Jr. at the Pyramyd Air Cup next week and I will ask him again.
Please convey warm greetings to Hans Jr. from Weihrauch’s biggest fan in Iceland.
And could you please ask him to bring back the old style HW77 stock, at least as an aftermarket part? The new Minelli stock is too chunky and busy for my liking.
Another suggestion is to replace the HW77 rear sight (which is too close to the eye even when far forward on the dovetail) with a sporting peep sight.
I’ll see what I can do.
Thanks. While you are at it, please tell him to not let Minelli anywhere near the HW35E! 🙂
You had better accuracy with your Marksman 2004, albeit at 25 feet. It is probably the luck of the draw, although my 2004, was more accurate out of the box than my P17. With some burr removal and polish on the barrel of my P17, I was able to get it shoot better but not as good as my 2004.
If you have time to push a pellet down the barrel of your P17, I would like to hear what you find.
It will be interesting to see how it does with the dot sight and deep seating the pellets. I don’t think deep seating the pellets will help on your gun because your velocities were very consistent.
My P17 was shooting about the same size groups as yours at 10 yards. I also tried several different pellets.
Just for kicks I mounted a cheap AIM 2-7×42 pistol scope with a 1 piece mount on it to see if it would shrink my groups. It worked. With it resting on a sandbag I was shooting 3/8 inch 5 shot groups at 10 yards.
Another surprise was the best ammo for mine is the cheap Beeman Hollow Point Coated Pellets.
All of my pellets were seated flush.
Thanks. I think the dot sight will help.
I had excellent results with my Marksman 2004 branded variant using a dot sight and JSB exact RS 7.33 grain pellets.
I did polish the crown with a cratex block and eased the breech lead-in chamfer using a Dremel tapered stone chucked into a slow cordless screwdriver. Also brushed the bore with JB bore paste.
You’ve got history on this, BB:
It would be great finally to see you do a P3/HW40 versus P17/2004 head-to-head.
That P3 was really a guest blog test by Mac. I had been out of the hospital two months and was still being fed through a tube when it was written. I had no strength to cock this kind of gun at that time.
How about putting a Bug Buster Scope on it. I got pretty good groups out to 20-25 yds (about an inch) with JSB 8.44’s and a tripod rest (watch your fingers !)